UMI Max
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix GalaxyCore GC5005
Pricecompare
Average of 11 scores (from 17 reviews)
Reviews for the UMI Max
USB Type-C for entry-level price. For a street price of 150 Euros (~$160), the Chinese manufacturer UMi is offering an interesting package: powerful hardware, a 4,000 mAh battery and the modern Type-C USB port are included in the Max model.
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/27/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Móviles chinos libres ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good design; high performance; flexible fingerprint sensor. Negative: Relatively heavy; average autonomy; poor main camera.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Hispazone ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; good performance. Negative: Poor cameras; weak GPS.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2016
Source: 4G News PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 90% performance: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 65%
Source: Tecnologia.com.pt PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Relatively heavy; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/25/2016
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 59% price: 70% display: 73% mobility: 45% workmanship: 73%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 43% price: 52% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 66% features: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 70% features: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 65%
Source: Key for web IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; metal case; flexible fingerprint sensor; good display; decent performance; long battery life. Negative: Unsupport fast charge.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2016
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Metal case; beautiful design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/25/2016
Comment
ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P10 MT6755: ARM-based octa core SoC (8x Cortex-A53) with 64 Bit support and a clock rate of up to 2 GHz per core.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.70.25%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.