LG Q7
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 25 reviews)
Reviews for the LG Q7
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe LG Q7 offers some enticing features - such as waterproofing, quick charging and fingerprint scanning - but there's not much more in the package to draw you in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2018
Source: Htxt Africa
Archive.org versionWell styled and equally well equipped, the Q7 from LG features all one needs from a mid-range phone. If you're in the market for a svelte option, it's highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 61% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Slim size; light weight; waterproof IP68; nice display. Negative: Weak hardware; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 75% features: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Androidiani
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 55% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 59% price: 62% features: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 60% display: 75% mobility: 62% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 95%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; high performance; decent cameras. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; support waterproof; good cameras; nice display; fast charging; decent speakers. Negative: High price; no face ID; inflexible fingerprint sensor; short battery life; low performance; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; support waterproof. Negative: Inflexible face ID.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 50%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 45% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; fast fingerprint sensor; fast charging. Negative: Poor cameras; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice cameras; good display; fast charging; NFC chip. Negative: Low performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Source: DGL.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice performance; compact size; premium design; solid workmanship. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Solid workmanship; support waterproof and dust avoiding; good hardware; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2018
Source: Mobil.se
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 58%
Source: Arena IT
→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Playtech.ro
→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware. Negative: Origin design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6750S: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 up to 1.5 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 up to 1 GHz) with 64-Bit support and integrated LTE Cat. 6 radio. Compared to the MT6750, the MT6750S seems to offer a higher clocked graphics card.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.