LG Q7
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 25 reviews)
Reviews for the LG Q7
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The LG Q7 offers some enticing features - such as waterproofing, quick charging and fingerprint scanning - but there's not much more in the package to draw you in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2018
Source: Htxt Africa Archive.org version
Well styled and equally well equipped, the Q7 from LG features all one needs from a mid-range phone. If you're in the market for a svelte option, it's highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 61% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Slim size; light weight; waterproof IP68; nice display. Negative: Weak hardware; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 75% features: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 55% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 59% price: 62% features: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 60% display: 75% mobility: 62% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 95%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; high performance; decent cameras. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; support waterproof; good cameras; nice display; fast charging; decent speakers. Negative: High price; no face ID; inflexible fingerprint sensor; short battery life; low performance; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Les Numeriques FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; support waterproof. Negative: Inflexible face ID.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 50%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 45% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; fast fingerprint sensor; fast charging. Negative: Poor cameras; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; good display; fast charging; NFC chip. Negative: Low performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice performance; compact size; premium design; solid workmanship. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; support waterproof and dust avoiding; good hardware; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2018
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 58%
Source: Arena IT →EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Playtech.ro →EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware. Negative: Origin design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6750S: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 up to 1.5 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 up to 1 GHz) with 64-Bit support and integrated LTE Cat. 6 radio. Compared to the MT6750, the MT6750S seems to offer a higher clocked graphics card.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.LG:
LG Electronics Inc. is a subsidiary of LG Group. It is a South Korean company and was founded as Goldstar Co, Ltd, in 1958. The group offers products in the fields of information technology, consumer electronics and mobile communications, and home appliances. LG Electronics is the world's third largest home appliance manufacturer. As a notebook manufacturer, LG only became known to a wider audience in the German-speaking market in 2005. After a few years, LG largely withdrew from the laptop sector. The product range includes OLED, LED/LCD and plasma TVs, home theater systems, Blu-ray players as well as audio and video players.
65.87%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.