LG Q7
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 15 scores (from 25 reviews)
Reviews for the LG Q7
Source: Techradar

The LG Q7 offers some enticing features - such as waterproofing, quick charging and fingerprint scanning - but there's not much more in the package to draw you in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2018
Source: Htxt Africa

Well styled and equally well equipped, the Q7 from LG features all one needs from a mid-range phone. If you're in the market for a svelte option, it's highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 61% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Slim size; light weight; waterproof IP68; nice display. Negative: Weak hardware; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 75% features: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Androidiani

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 55% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 59% price: 62% features: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 60% display: 75% mobility: 62% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 95%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech

Positive: Good price; high performance; decent cameras. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Beautiful design; support waterproof; good cameras; nice display; fast charging; decent speakers. Negative: High price; no face ID; inflexible fingerprint sensor; short battery life; low performance; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; support waterproof. Negative: Inflexible face ID.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 50%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 45% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Beautiful design; fast fingerprint sensor; fast charging. Negative: Poor cameras; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Nice cameras; good display; fast charging; NFC chip. Negative: Low performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Source: DGL.ru

Positive: Nice performance; compact size; premium design; solid workmanship. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Positive: Solid workmanship; support waterproof and dust avoiding; good hardware; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2018
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 58%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Playtech.ro

Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware. Negative: Origin design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6750S: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 up to 1.5 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 up to 1 GHz) with 64-Bit support and integrated LTE Cat. 6 radio. Compared to the MT6750, the MT6750S seems to offer a higher clocked graphics card.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.0.145 kg:
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
LG:
LG Electronics Inc. is a subsidiary of the LG Group. LG is the world's second-biggest maker of televisions and third-biggest maker of mobile phones. With its headquarters in South Korea, the company has 75 subsidiaries worldwide that design and manufacture televisions, home appliances, and telecommunications devices. LG is an international laptop manufacturer of medium size with few reviews.
After a few years, LG largely withdrew from the laptop sector. In the smartphone segment, LG is a medium-sized manufacturer (not among the Top 5 in 2015 and 2016).
65.87%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.