Toshiba Satellite P300
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Toshiba Satellite P300
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionToshiba's P300 offers impressive value and performance, but is bettered in some instances by its rivals. While the Satellite Pro P300-1FP is a great value laptop at this price point, its more expensive rivals inevitably better it in key areas. However, thanks to its stronger performance and a price tag of up to £100 less than some comparable laptops, you may find the trade off to be one worth making.
80
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/09/2009
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Authority
Archive.org versionBut don’t be fooled: the Satellite P300 is a genuinely good laptop. Its entertainment credentials are improved by superb speakers, and considering its spec it also offers reasonable value for money.
von 6: 83, Leistung 83, Mobilität 3, Ausstattung 83
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/02/2008
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 83% features: 83% mobility: 50%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Magnus.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/08/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2008
Rating: Total score: 42% price: 71% performance: 62% features: 54% display: 40% mobility: 9% ergonomy: 26%
Source: PC Magazin - 9/08
Single Review, , Short, Date: 08/15/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Magazin - 9/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2008
Rating: performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/27/2008
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 68% features: 78% display: 86% mobility: 89% ergonomy: 76%
Source: Connect - 5/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/07/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 30%
Source: PC World Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/25/2008
Rating: performance: 80% display: 90%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T5550:
Slow clocked dual core processor based on the Merom-2M core without virtualization functions.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
