Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T8100Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2100 MHz2260 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.000V-1.250V45 nm, 1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA956
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, Idle StatesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$209 U.S.$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T8100Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2217     avg: 2310     median: 2320 (21%)     max: 2357 Points
min: 2508     avg: 2522     median: 2517 (22%)     max: 2541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4102     avg: 4251     median: 4282 (6%)     max: 4332 Points
min: 4753     avg: 4759     median: 4757 (6%)     max: 4767 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
37.5 s (8%)
min: 35.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (11%)     max: 69.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 1146     avg: 1642     median: 1641.5 (19%)     max: 2137 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1764     avg: 1851     median: 1878 (4%)     max: 1909 Points
min: 1941     avg: 1996     median: 1974 (4%)     max: 2074 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.1 (5%)     max: 24.23 s
min: 20.03     avg: 21     median: 21 (5%)     max: 22 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54.6     avg: 55.2     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
min: 47.24     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (2%)     max: 48 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1347 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19291 MIPS (9%)
19380 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15392 MFLOPS (12%)
16680 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3250     avg: 4504     median: 4605 (29%)     max: 5677 Points
min: 4425     avg: 4480     median: 4480 (28%)     max: 4535 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4     avg: 4.8     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SP9300 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8100 +
4046 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 103% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 15:23:23

#0 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0s ... 0.009s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#47 got single benchmarks 380 +0.022s ... 0.031s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0s ... 0.031s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#50 got single benchmarks 421 +0.009s ... 0.041s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.048s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#123 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#125 return log +0.004s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)