T-Mobile G-Slate
Specifications
T-Mobile G-Slate
Processor
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250) 2c/2t 2 x 1 GHz, T20 Harmony
Graphics adapter
Display
8.90 inch 5:3, 1280 x 768 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
700 g ( = 24.69 oz / 1.54 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
600 Euro
Sold in
Anglo-America
Links
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the T-Mobile G-Slate
T-Mobile G-Slate
Source: PC World
Archive.org version
The T-Mobile G-Slate is a reasonable tablet choice if you like the idea of a tablet that, in terms of size, fits in between the rest. But it's worth the investment only if you're willing to lock into a contract. At $750 without a contract, it's far too expensive for what you get--even though the 3D video capture provides novel entertainment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/21/2011
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC World
Archive.org versionThe T-Mobile G-Slate is a reasonable tablet choice if you like the idea of a tablet that, in terms of size, fits in between the rest. But it's worth the investment only if you're willing to lock into a contract. At $750 without a contract, it's far too expensive for what you get--even though the 3D video capture provides novel entertainment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/21/2011
Rating: Total score: 70%
T-Mobile G-Slate with Google (by LG)
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
Honeycomb gets a lot of the little things right—like a great multitasking view bar, and excellent notifications for email and calendar. These are implemented better than Apple's iOS, but the iPad's overall OS experience remains smoother and easier to organize. Even the RIM BlackBerry PlayBook ($499, 2.5 stars)—maligned for shipping without enough necessary features intact—has a less cluttered, more easily-navigated user default interface (though most of the Honeycomb screens can be customized). So, Honeycomb gets the small stuff right, but here's hoping the next tablet OS from Google tones down the unnecessarily busy home screen(s) and simplifies things like Apple and RIM have done.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/19/2011
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag
Archive.org versionHoneycomb gets a lot of the little things right—like a great multitasking view bar, and excellent notifications for email and calendar. These are implemented better than Apple's iOS, but the iPad's overall OS experience remains smoother and easier to organize. Even the RIM BlackBerry PlayBook ($499, 2.5 stars)—maligned for shipping without enough necessary features intact—has a less cluttered, more easily-navigated user default interface (though most of the Honeycomb screens can be customized). So, Honeycomb gets the small stuff right, but here's hoping the next tablet OS from Google tones down the unnecessarily busy home screen(s) and simplifies things like Apple and RIM have done.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/19/2011
Rating: Total score: 70%
LG Optimus Pad / T-Mobile G-Slate Tablet Review
Source: Techspot Archive.org version
But no matter what the numbers, the T-Mobile G-Slate is a really nice tablet. It's nice to hold, easy on the eyes, and runs flawlessly. We're still waiting for more Android tablet applications, but those are sure to come eventually.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2011
Source: Techspot
Archive.org versionBut no matter what the numbers, the T-Mobile G-Slate is a really nice tablet. It's nice to hold, easy on the eyes, and runs flawlessly. We're still waiting for more Android tablet applications, but those are sure to come eventually.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2011
T-Mobile G-Slate Review
Source: Slashgear Archive.org version
Honeycomb still falls short of being mass-market ready, though it’s certainly full of promise. As Google has shown with its smartphone iterations of Android, it has no intention of standing still and allowing iOS to dominate the market. The G-Slate makes – with things like Flash Player support out of the box – a better first-impression than the XOOM managed, but it still lacks the general appeal of the iPad 2. A few solid firmware updates could address that, but it will take T-Mobile chiseling away at the G-Slate’s price before we could wholeheartedly recommend the tablet.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2011
Source: Slashgear
Archive.org versionHoneycomb still falls short of being mass-market ready, though it’s certainly full of promise. As Google has shown with its smartphone iterations of Android, it has no intention of standing still and allowing iOS to dominate the market. The G-Slate makes – with things like Flash Player support out of the box – a better first-impression than the XOOM managed, but it still lacks the general appeal of the iPad 2. A few solid firmware updates could address that, but it will take T-Mobile chiseling away at the G-Slate’s price before we could wholeheartedly recommend the tablet.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2011
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce ULP (Tegra 2): In Tegra 3 SoC integrated ultra low power GPU. Depending on the model clocked at 300 to 400 MHz.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
2 (250): SoC (System on a Chip) with a integrated Corex A9 Dual-Core, GeForce ULP and other dedicated subprocessors (Audio, Video).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Add as a preferred source on Google
