Packard Bell Liberty Tab G100
Specifications
Packard Bell Liberty Tab G100
Processor
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250) 2 x 1 GHz, T20 Harmony
Graphics adapter
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
800 g ( = 28.22 oz / 1.76 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
400 Euro
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 4 scores (from 4 reviews)
Average of 4 scores (from 4 reviews)
price: 82%, performance: 72%, features: 76%, display: 83% mobility: 80%, workmanship: - %, ergonomy: 74%, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Packard Bell Liberty Tab G100
Packard Bell Liberty Tab review
Source: Techradar
Archive.org version
Overall, the usability and performance of the Liberty Tab is on a par with other Android tablets of the Honeycomb era, but two favourable points make this worth considering. Firstly, the price is reasonable – the Liberty Tab comes in at £100 cheaper than its tablet twin, the Acer Iconia A500.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/26/2011
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionOverall, the usability and performance of the Liberty Tab is on a par with other Android tablets of the Honeycomb era, but two favourable points make this worth considering. Firstly, the price is reasonable – the Liberty Tab comes in at £100 cheaper than its tablet twin, the Acer Iconia A500.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/26/2011
Rating: Total score: 60%
Packard Bell Liberty Tab review
Source: PC Pro Archive.org version
Overall, we enjoyed using the Liberty Tab in the time we had it, and the price is pretty good, too: the 16GB version is reasonably priced at £350 (there’s no 3G option as yet, and the 32GB version wasn’t available at the time of writing), which puts it on a par for value with the Asus Eee Pad Transformer. For our money, having the option of the keyboard dock, a lighter chassis and better-quality IPS display edges things in favour of the Asus, but if you did buy the Packard Bell, we can’t honestly say you’ll be disappointed.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/19/2011
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 83% features: 67% ergonomy: 67%
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org versionOverall, we enjoyed using the Liberty Tab in the time we had it, and the price is pretty good, too: the 16GB version is reasonably priced at £350 (there’s no 3G option as yet, and the 32GB version wasn’t available at the time of writing), which puts it on a par for value with the Asus Eee Pad Transformer. For our money, having the option of the keyboard dock, a lighter chassis and better-quality IPS display edges things in favour of the Asus, but if you did buy the Packard Bell, we can’t honestly say you’ll be disappointed.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/19/2011
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 83% features: 67% ergonomy: 67%
Packard Bell Liberty Tab
Source: ITP Archive.org version
While the Liberty Tab requires a bit of optimisation it’s the least expensive path to owning a Honeycomb-powered device.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/12/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 80%
Source: ITP
Archive.org versionWhile the Liberty Tab requires a bit of optimisation it’s the least expensive path to owning a Honeycomb-powered device.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/12/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Tablets im Test
Source: Computerbild - 24/11
Comparison, , Medium, Date: 11/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 82% display: 83% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Computerbild - 24/11
Comparison, , Medium, Date: 11/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 82% display: 83% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce ULP (Tegra 2): In Tegra 3 SoC integrated ultra low power GPU. Depending on the model clocked at 300 to 400 MHz.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
2 (250): SoC (System on a Chip) with a integrated Corex A9 Dual-Core, GeForce ULP and other dedicated subprocessors (Audio, Video).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
