Packard Bell Liberty Tab G100

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Packard Bell Liberty Tab G100

60% Packard Bell Liberty Tab review
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
Overall, the usability and performance of the Liberty Tab is on a par with other Android tablets of the Honeycomb era, but two favourable points make this worth considering. Firstly, the price is reasonable – the Liberty Tab comes in at £100 cheaper than its tablet twin, the Acer Iconia A500.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/26/2011
Rating: Total score: 60%

83% Packard Bell Liberty Tab review
Source: PC Pro Archive.org version
Overall, we enjoyed using the Liberty Tab in the time we had it, and the price is pretty good, too: the 16GB version is reasonably priced at £350 (there’s no 3G option as yet, and the 32GB version wasn’t available at the time of writing), which puts it on a par for value with the Asus Eee Pad Transformer. For our money, having the option of the keyboard dock, a lighter chassis and better-quality IPS display edges things in favour of the Asus, but if you did buy the Packard Bell, we can’t honestly say you’ll be disappointed.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/19/2011
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 83% features: 67% ergonomy: 67%

80% Packard Bell Liberty Tab
Source: ITP Archive.org version
While the Liberty Tab requires a bit of optimisation it’s the least expensive path to owning a Honeycomb-powered device.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/12/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 80%

Foreign Reviews

84% Tablets im Test
Source: Computerbild - 24/11
Comparison, , Medium, Date: 11/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 82% display: 83% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%

Comment

NVIDIA GeForce ULP (Tegra 2): In Tegra 3 SoC integrated ultra low power GPU. Depending on the model clocked at 300 to 400 MHz.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

2 (250): SoC (System on a Chip) with a integrated Corex A9 Dual-Core, GeForce ULP and other dedicated subprocessors (Audio, Video).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

10.10":

This is a standard display format for tablet computers or small convertibles. You see more on the screen than on a smartphone but you can't use big resolutions well. On the other hand, mobility is not a problem.

Packard Bell: Packard Bell is a subsidiary of Taiwan-based Acer. It is a name used by two different consumer electronics companies. The first was an American radio manufacturer founded in 1926, that later became a defense contractor and manufacturer of other consumer electronics, such as television sets. Teledyne acquired the business in 1978. In 1986, investors bought the name for a newly formed personal computer manufacturer. Originally the company produced discount computers in the US, later computers were produced for the European market. NEC took it over in the late 1990s. Acer acquired it in 2008. In spite of the similarity of their names, there has never been any corporate connection between the original or later Packard Bell and Hewlett Packard, or Bell System. Packard Bell is an international notebook manufacturer. Many years, the company focussed ruggedized laptops.

PB is not present in the smartphone/tablet market and a rather small manufacturer of laptops. There are hardly any reviews since 2015.

76.75%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices with the same GPU

Devices from the same Manufacturer