Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.1 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core, but Trusted Execution and Virtualization (VT-x) are disabled.

The P7450 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9600Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2130 MHz
FSB8001066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm0.775-1.1V45 nm1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9600Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (21%)     max: 2575 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (6%)     max: 4863 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1230     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1243 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 22     avg: 23.5     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 54     avg: 55.7     median: 55.4 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P7450 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 20:39:19

#0 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 got single benchmarks 473 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.017s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.018s

#50 got single benchmarks 445 +0.023s ... 0.041s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#107 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.046s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.027s ... 0.074s

#109 return log +0.004s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)