The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.
Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
The Core 2 Duo SL9380 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.8 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core. Compared to the SL9400, the SL9380 offers only an FSB with 800 MHz clock rate (instead of 1066) and exactly 1.8 GHz (SL9400 1.86).
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 26. 19:32:21
#0 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0.003s ... 0.03s
#8 got single benchmarks 424 +0.036s ... 0.065s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0.003s ... 0.068s
#10 got single benchmarks 397 +0.03s ... 0.098s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0.002s ... 0.1s
#12 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.1s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.071s ... 0.172s