Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted quietly in July 2024. The APU comes equipped with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz along with the 16 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 55 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former.

This Ryzen AI 9 series APU shares most of the specifications with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more power-efficient version of the full Zen 5 core. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 APUs deliver a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4-powered APUs thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 375 supports LPDDR5x-7500 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is also natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU is a lot more complex than the original XDNA was for up to 55 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the striking similarity in specs, we fully expect the HX 375 to perform about as well as the HX 370 for very decent but certainly not ground-breaking multi-thread performance that's mostly on par with the Core i5-13500HX and the Ryzen 7 7745HX.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful AMD iGPU, as of mid 2024. It features 16 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. Performance-wise, the graphics adapter can be as slow as the Arc 8 or as fast as the RTX 2050 Laptop depending on the benchmark or game. On average, the 890M finds itself very close to the GTX 1650 Laptop making it possible to play 2024 AAA games at 1080p with most settings set to Low.

Naturally, the AMD iGPU is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors and it can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 375 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W if needed. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The TSMC N4P process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted quietly in July 2024. The APU comes equipped with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz along with the 16 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 55 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support. Unlike it is with the non-PRO AI 9 HX 375 chip, the AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM co-processor) is onboard, as well as a few other higher-end features such as AMD-Vi.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at lower clock speeds of maximal 3.3 GHz than the former and offer less cache.

This Ryzen AI 9 series APU shares most of the specifications with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more power-efficient version of the full Zen 5 core. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 APUs deliver a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4-powered APUs thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX PRO 375 supports LPDDR5x-7500 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is also natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU is a lot more complex than the original XDNA was for up to 55 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the striking similarity in specs, we fully expect the HX 375 to perform about as well as the HX 370 for very decent but certainly not ground-breaking multi-thread performance that's mostly on par with the Core i5-13500HX and the Ryzen 7 7745HX.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful AMD iGPU, as of mid 2024. It features 16 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. Performance-wise, the graphics adapter can be as slow as the Arc 8 or as fast as the RTX 2050 Laptop depending on the benchmark or game. On average, the 890M finds itself very close to the GTX 1650 Laptop making it possible to play 2024 AAA games at 1080p with most settings set to Low.

Naturally, the AMD iGPU is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors and it can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX PRO 375 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W if needed. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The TSMC N4P process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, power efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point-HX (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 « 2 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 3752 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 3752 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 « 2 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB12 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP54 Watt54 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
95.6 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1162 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21812 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1988 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
776 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8541 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3334 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
301 Points (83%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
77867 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5856 MIPS (69%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.1 fps (44%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
241 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
159 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
20306 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19569 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
30229 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10891 Points (46%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2867 Points (72%)
2792 Points (70%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
15220 Points (59%)
14846 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2121 Points (83%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14728 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
431 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
277 Points (76%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
348 Points (62%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1720 Points (64%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.1 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
67.8 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
2.9 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
49.2 Points per Watt (37%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 → 97% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 23. 05:04:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17992 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19565 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755918296s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17992 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17992 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19565 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 19565 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.031s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.032s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)