Notebookcheck Logo

Review Asus VivoBook S300CA Subnotebook

Entry-level touch device. An elegant aluminium case, economic ULV hardware, long battery life - the VivoBook S300CA possesses many advantages of expensive ultrabooks, but is already available for under 600 Euros (~$787). As the icing on the cake, a touchscreen was incorporated, which is meant to set it apart from the competition.

For the original German review, see here.

Slim notebooks and subnotebooks with touchscreen displays enjoy a constantly growing popularity - a trend, which Asus is taking into account with its VivoBook series. We have already reviewed the S200E (11.6-inch), S400CA (14-inch) as well as the S550CM (15.6-inch) and we would like to look at the VivoBook S300C this time.

With an entry price of under 600 Euros (~$787), this device is targeted towards price conscious buyers who are looking for a thin and mobile notebook for simple multimedia tasks. The required power is supplied by a Core i3-3217U supported by 4 GB RAM and a 500 GB hard drive.  One has to do without a dedicated graphics card; instead an integrated HD Graphics 4000 is responsible for outputting to the touch-sensitive WXGA display (1366x768 pixels).

Other manufacturers have made use of the new Metro interface in Windows 8 and brought similar touch notebooks to the market. For example, there is Acer's Aspire V5 range or inexpensive ultrabooks such as the Sony Vaio SV-T1312.

Case

Wie wir testen - Gehäuse

High-quality aluminum case
High-quality aluminum case

Similar to other devices from the VivoBook range, the S300C also uses an aluminum case, which is rarely found in this price range. For both the back of the display as well as a large part of the base unit, only the bottom part is covered with black plastic.

Despite a thickness of only 21 millimeters, the S300C can't officially carry the ultrabook label. With 1.8 kilograms you wouldn't exactly call it light, but it is suitable for carrying around occasionally. The robust construction is beneficial for the stability of the case:  The unibody case is able to resist high pressure without us observing strong deformations or creaking noises.

Even the display proves itself to be very solid and warp resistant. Unfortunately, the display hinge is rather stiff, but there's too much leeway, so that any input via touchscreen is followed by some "swinging" - an annoying flaw which can also be found in many cheap devices. The above average workmanship and the overall quality could only offset the mentioned flaw to a certain extent.

Connectivity

Wie wir testen - Ausstattung

Compared to many subnotebooks, the connection interfaces of the S300CA are fairly satisfying. Altogether, the user has access to three USB connections, of which only one supports the USB 3.0 standard. Beyond that, Asus has two display-out connections (VGA and HDMI) as well as further important interfaces such as Gigabit LAN and an integrated SD card reader. Somewhat unfortunate, but not uncommon, is the combination of headset and microphone connections in one single 3.5 mm jack - some headsets might not be able to operate without an adapter.

Similar to most competitors, the connections are easily accessible at the side of the case. The manufacturer paid attention to sensible positioning (often required ports are further at the front) and sufficient gaps between the connections.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Left side: Kensington lock, 2x USB 2.0, headset jack, SD card reader
Left side: Kensington lock, 2x USB 2.0, headset jack, SD card reader
Back: No ports
Back: No ports
Right side: USB 3.0, HDMI, VGA, Gigabit-LAN, power port
Right side: USB 3.0, HDMI, VGA, Gigabit-LAN, power port

Communication

The WLAN adapter of the S300CA comes from Qualcomm/Atheros (Model AR9485) and belongs to the entry-level category. Only the usual radio standards are supported (802.11b/g/n) and it doesn't come with the latest high speed version 802.11ac or support for networks in the 5 GHz band. In a short test, we were able to establish a stable connection with excellent reception and a data transfer rate of 150 Mbit/s over a distance of 5 meters and through a wall - a sign that the metal case doesn't impact negatively on the WLAN reception. Furthermore, Bluetooth 4.0 is also part of the standard package.

A small white LED indicates activation of the webcam, which is hidden in the display frame of the VivoBook. Photos and videos are taken with a maximum resolution of 1280x720 pixels (corresponding to 0.9 megapixels) and is accompanied by slight noise and moderate detail reproduction. The quality of the integrated microphone is also just as average - however, for video chats it is perfectly sufficient.

Accessories

optische Maus im Lieferumfang
Bundled optical mouse

In the box of the S300CA, we can find the notebook with an integrated battery, a compact 65 Watt power adapter, different brochures and a wired optical mouse. Asus proves to be a little bit more generous compared to other manufacturers, even though the value of those extras - especially the additional mouse - isn't very high in particular.

Software features include a virus scanner (McAfee Internet Security Demo) and various manufacturer tools, most of which are not too useful. Windows 8 beginners will be pleased about the Asus Tutor, which explains the most important key shortcuts and functionality of the operating system in detail.

Maintenance

It only requires a common Phillips screwdriver in order to remove the complete bottom plate from the notebook. Possible upgrade options are very limited: The soldered main memory can neither be removed nor upgraded; other free slots, such as mSata, are missing. Only the WLAN module (only one antenna) and the 2.5-inch hard drive can be replaced. The option to remove dust from the fan is very useful, however.

Warranty

Asus provides buyers of the VivoBook with a standard warranty of 24 months; excluding the battery, which only receives a 12 month warranty from the manufacturer. As usual the battery life can be extended by paying more: Different (on-line) dealers offer a variety of packages, for example another year of pick up & return service for 75 Euros (~$98).

Input Devices

Wie wir testen - Eingabegeräte

Keyboard

Similar to many other ultrabooks, the chiclet design keyboard integrates itself seamlessly into the aluminum case, which provides the S300CA with a particularly sophisticated appearance. Nevertheless, we still discover potential for improvement in the detail: The material in the middle area is a bit too thin, causing slight bending when exerting strong pressure on the 15 x 15 mm keys. 

However, it is not harmful for a successful typing experience.  Although the key strokes are short and slightly soft, the user receives a precise feedback on each input. The low noise emission is pleasant and qualifies the VivoBook for working in a library or other noise-sensitive environments.

Touchpad

Once again, we have to criticize Asus for a touchpad which wasn't fitted very well.  The lower left corner of the input area protrudes a few centimeters, while the right side is integrated seamlessly into the case. Consequently, the clicking of both mouse keys differs and is occasionally accompanied by some quiet creaking. 

The touchpad measures approximately 10.5 x 6 centimeters and offers sufficient space to navigate and execute different multi-touch gestures. A smooth, gliding surface and direct response characteristics rank among the positives of the input device.

Keyboard
Keyboard
Touchpad
Touchpad

 

Touchscreen

With the help of a capacitive touchscreen, Windows 8 can be operated more comfortably and intuitively - this applies to the new tile surface of the operating system at least, which offers fairly pleasing smooth animations. For traditional desktop applications however, it is better to use the mouse and keyboard in order to navigate more easily to smaller symbols and buttons. This restriction is not because of the accurate touchscreen, but the supplied software; in addition, more precise display hinges would have been welcomed, as mentioned in the previous Case section.

Display

Wie wir testen - Display

Not to our surprise, Asus is using a WXGA display with 1366x768 pixels for the VivoBook S300CA,which translates into 118 dpi which is acceptable for a 13.3-inch unit. Without a doubt: An even finer Full HD display would have been a highlight, but is not very practical in this price segment.

The LED display can be adjusted over 12 levels and achieves a maximum brightness of 202 cd/m² with an even distribution across the whole surface. For most indoor rooms, the brightness is fully sufficient, even though we would have loved to see higher performance from a glare panel. However, some ultrabooks, such as the Sony Vaio SV-T1312, are not necessarily brighter with only 155 cd/m².

203
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
208
cd/m²
206
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
195
cd/m²
188
cd/m²
194
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CMO N133BGE-L41 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 214 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 201.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 161 cd/m²
Contrast: 611:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)44.62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.07% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

Due to low black levels of 0.35 cd/m², the contrast reaches unexpected heights: For a TN panel, the contrast of 611:1 is extremely impressive, even if the display produced by CMO (designation N133BGE-L41) cannot distinguish itself considerably from the competition. This is particularly because of the reduced viewing angles, which we will investigate in more detail shortly.

The S300CA is primarily targeted at home users and doesn't meet the requirements of graphics professionals, which require very accurate color reproduction. In an uncalibrated state, blue tones deviate from the reference level (DeltaE > 15), other colors as well as gray tones are reproduced with acceptable accuracy. Another typical problem is the limited color range: Neither sRGB nor the AdobeRGB standards can be covered completely by the display.

S300CA vs. AdobeRGB (t)
S300CA vs. AdobeRGB (t)
S300CA vs. sRGB (t)
S300CA vs. sRGB (t)
S300CA vs. Vaio SV-T1312 (t)
S300CA vs. Vaio SV-T1312 (t)
Color fidelity (uncalibrated)
Color fidelity (uncalibrated)
Color saturation (uncalibrated)
Color saturation (uncalibrated)
Gray tones (uncalibrated)
Gray tones (uncalibrated)
Outdoor use
Outdoor use

For external use, the user has to live with strong reflections, which are attributed to the reflecting display surface. With brighter background lighting, Asus would have been able to tackle this problem - instead the brightness drops even further in battery mode down to 160 cd/m². Thus, the only option is to find a shadowy workplace.

Viewing angles Asus VivoBook S300CA
Viewing angles Asus VivoBook S300CA

Due to its technological nature, a TN panel is very sensitive to skewed viewing angles. Only when looking at the display directly at the right angle, does it show maximum contrast and true colors. In this category, the S300CA performs more or less the same as its rivals: When changing the viewing angle vertically by a few degrees, distortions in the image already start to occur. Horizontally, it allows for a little bit more flexibility.

Performance

Wie wir testen - Leistung

In order to avoid overburdening of the compact 13-inch case, Asus equips the VivoBook with ULV CPUs from Intel's Ivy Bridge range. The choice is between the Core i3-3217U and the somewhat more powerful Core i5-3317U.

Our review unit houses the 1.8 GHz Core i3 processor, which possesses two cores and Hyper-Threading technology for the parallel calculation of up to four threads. However, the i3 has to do without an additional Turbo Boost - this feature remains reserved for the more expensive i5 and i7 models. Like all Ivy Bridge CPUs, the 3217U is manufactured in a 22 nanometer process with Tri-Gate transistors and is specified with a ULV typical TDP of 17 Watts. 

Apart from the CPU cores and the Northbridge integrated memory controller, the chip also integrates a graphic processor unit, which is called HD Graphics 4000 by Intel. This has 16 so-called Execution Units (EUs), which in the case of the i3-3217U clock at 350 to 1,050 MHz.  One shouldn't expect any performance miracles: In the best case, the HD 4000 might be able to achieve performance similar to dedicated entry-level cards, such as the GeForce 610M.

In addition, the performance is further reduced, as the 4 GB DDR3-1600 RAM of the VivoBook S300CA runs only in single-channel mode. Beyond that, the notebook is equipped with a 500 GB hard drive for the operating system and user data.

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM SPD
Systeminfo GPUZ
Systeminfo HWInfo
DPC Latenzen
System information Asus VivoBook S300CA

Processor

A few years ago, ULV processors were deemed slow and unsuitable for many applications, but current models are actually performing at acceptable levels - this also includes the relatively inexpensive Core i3-3217U.  In the Cinebench R11.5 (64-Bit version) benchmark, it is able to score 1.8 points, which ranks at the level of the AMD A8-4500M or Core i3-330M, which carry a significantly higher TDP of 35 Watt.

Considering the small upgrade price for the Core i5-3317U, we would also like to make a short estimate for this model. Provided that the Turbo Boost can be used to its fullest, application performance might rise by around a considerable 30 to 40% - not an insignificant difference, which the prospective buyer should probably consider.

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus VivoBook S300CA
HD Graphics 4000, 3217U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
1.78 Points
Sony Vaio SV-T1312V1ES
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, ADATA AXM14S3-128GM-B
2.37 Points +33%
Asus Zenbook Prime UX31A-C4027H
HD Graphics 4000, 3517U, ADATA XM11 256GB
2.82 Points +58%
Asus VivoBook U38DT-R3001H
Radeon HD 8550M, A8-4555M, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT0 12-9WS142
0.78 Points -56%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2509
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5525
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4188
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
3079 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
6972 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4390 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
12.33 fps
Help

Storage Devices

HDTune benchmark
HDTune benchmark

An SSD is not available, neither for money nor through negotiation, instead Asus integrates a conventional non-removable drive with 500 GB capacity. In our review unit, the storage medium comes from the Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 range, which rotates at 5,400 rpm and offers an 8 MB cache. Those who are considering upgrading should be aware of the construction height of 7 mm; normal 2.5-inch hard drives usually measure 9.5 mm and wouldn't fit in the case.

HD Tune and CrystalDiskMark confirm a good transfer rate of just below 90 MB/s on average. Transfer rates could be a bit faster at 19.9 milliseconds, however, it really depends on the rotation speed. For a really noticeable performance boost installation of a flash memory drive would be required.

Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
Transfer Rate Minimum: 50.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 113.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 88.4 MB/s
Access Time: 19.9 ms
Burst Rate: 146.5 MB/s
CPU Usage: 3.5 %

System Performance

This much is for sure: The VivoBook can obviously not compete with ultrabooks that have an SSD and fast Core-i5 or Core-i7 processors. 4,607 points in PCMark Vantage and 2,173 points in PCMark 7 certify that our candidate can deliver a solid performance in accordance with its hardware configuration, which should be perfectly sufficient for most applications in everyday life.

Indeed: office tasks, such as browsing the internet or simple programs are not a challenge for the S300CA. For more demanding photo or video editing tasks, one should resort to better hardware - even if such software can actually be run in principle.

PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value)
Asus VivoBook S300CA
HD Graphics 4000, 3217U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
2173 Points
Asus VivoBook U38DT-R3001H
Radeon HD 8550M, A8-4555M, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT0 12-9WS142
1714 Points -21%
Dell Vostro 3360
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT007-9ZV142
2526 Points +16%
Sony Vaio SV-T1312V1ES
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, ADATA AXM14S3-128GM-B
4441 Points +104%
4.7
Windows 8 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
6.3
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
5.9
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
4.7
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
6.2
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.9
PCMark Vantage Result
4607 points
PCMark 7 Score
2173 points
Help

Graphics Card

The HD Graphics 4000 supports the processor not only during video rendering, but can also substantially speed up the encoding process via Quick Sync. An increasing number of applications make use of the GPU abilities of the graphics processor, by including various calculation processes in the shader units via OpenCL interface.

3D applications and games are not really fans of the HD 4000. Even though modern DirectX 11 applications can be run, it is usually only at a very low speed. This is confirmed by running 3DMark 11, which only provides us with a score of 551 points in the Performance preset scenario.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
Asus VivoBook S300CA
HD Graphics 4000, 3217U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
551 Points
Dell Vostro 3360
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT007-9ZV142
603 Points +9%
Sony Vaio SV-T1312V1ES
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, ADATA AXM14S3-128GM-B
561 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook U38DT-R3001H
Radeon HD 8550M, A8-4555M, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT0 12-9WS142
1242 Points +125%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
3356 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
2042 points
3DMark 11 Performance
551 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
23573 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2570 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
390 points
Help

Gaming Performance

Anno 2070
Anno 2070

For gamers, the VivoBook would not be a good recommendation. Older and less graphics intensive titles, such as Anno 2070, Diablo 3 or Dead Space 3 can be played at minimum settings, but the visuals are less impressive as a result of omitting many details as well as the low XGA resolution (1024x768 pixels). The hardware demanding action blockbuster Battlefield 3 results in a slide-show even with low settings. A dedicated middle-class graphics card, such as the GeForce GT 730M, is approximately four times as fast.

low med. high ultra
Battlefield 3 (2011) 11.7 9.1 8
Anno 2070 (2011) 32.4 17.3 11.4
Diablo III (2012) 39.6 22.8 18.6
Dead Space 3 (2013) 37.3 17.4 14.2

Emissions

Wie wir testen - Emissionen

System Noise

In idle mode and at low load, the S300 CA proves to be a very decent companion. In many everyday situations, the fan would turn off completely or rotate at such a low speed, that the notebook only emits a low buzzing from the hard drive. Our measuring instrument determines a noise level of 30.6 to 32.1 dB(A) - a good value when compared with alternatives such as the Acer Aspire S3 (30.6 - 35 dB(A)).

If the user operates the processor at full capacity for a prolonged period, the defensively tuned cooling system will also increase its activity slightly. Over time, the VivoBook will reach a clearly audible 39.6 dB(A), even if the constant and pleasant low-frequent noise isn't excessively disturbing. After a few minutes in idle mode, the fan goes back into its sleep mode.

Noise Level

Idle
30.6 / 30.9 / 31.4 dB(A)
HDD
32.1 dB(A)
Load
39.6 / 39.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Voltcraft SL 320 (15 cm distance)

Temperature

Stress test
Stress test

The low capacity of the ULV processor is reflected in the very low temperatures of the case.  If the hardware is not being stressed, the smooth aluminum case feels absolutely cold. Operation on the lap is therefore possible without any limitations.

Even at full load, it won't warm up excessively. Apart from a locally restricted "hotspot" around the fan exhaust, we measure uncritical temperatures from 26 to just above 40 °C.

In our one hour stress test with Prime95 and FurMark we examined whether the Core i3 is also able to retain a cool head. For the first 20 to 30 minutes the processor and GPU are clocked at a maximum rate of 1.8 GHz (CPU) and 1.05 GHz (GPU) and increase their temperature to 80 °C. Once this mark has been passed, a periodical clocking down of the CPU cores takes place, down to only 800 MHz. We couldn't observe this behavior in other applications and games, however, during summer temperatures throttling could become a problem.

Max. Load
 30.6 °C
87 F
45.5 °C
114 F
33 °C
91 F
 
 28.8 °C
84 F
41.1 °C
106 F
37.3 °C
99 F
 
 26.4 °C
80 F
27.1 °C
81 F
30.1 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 45.5 °C = 114 F
Average: 33.3 °C = 92 F
43 °C
109 F
51.3 °C
124 F
31.5 °C
89 F
40.7 °C
105 F
39 °C
102 F
30.5 °C
87 F
29 °C
84 F
27.8 °C
82 F
25.9 °C
79 F
Maximum: 51.3 °C = 124 F
Average: 35.4 °C = 96 F
Power Supply (max.)  38.1 °C = 101 F | Room Temperature 23.3 °C = 74 F | Voltcraft IR-360
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.3 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).

Speakers

The SonicMaster sound system known from other Asus notebooks, outputs sound very clearly and at a sufficient volume level, but struggles with deeper frequencies. Bass sequences sound rather thin and don't leave us with the desired impression - some other competitors perform better in this respect.

If the integrated stereo speakers are not sufficient, one can connect an external sound system via HDMI or 3.5 mm jack connection. The latter offers sufficient performance even for Hi-Fi headphones with high impedance and produces a low-noise output signal.

Energy Management

Wie wir testen - Akkulaufzeit

Power Consumption

Goodbye energy waste: Only 5.9 to 10.2 Watts is consumed by the VivoBook in idle mode, which means it ranks among the most economical devices of its class. With an SSD instead of the integrated hard drive, consumption could probably be lowered even more by a few hundred milliwatts.

Considering there is a maximum consumption of 30.9 to 33 Watts the supplied 65 Watt power adapter appears to be very generous; owing to these reserves the battery can be charged in parallel under full load. As soon as throttling kicks in due to high CPU temperature, the power consumption goes down to 25 Watt.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.9 / 10 / 10.2 Watt
Load midlight 30.9 / 33 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Life

44 Wh lithium-polymer battery (LiPo) is integrated into the case, which should provide for long battery life considering the low energy consumption.

During the Battery Eater Reader's Test (energy saving mode, minimum brightness, radio modules off), the S300CA is able to run for nearly 7 hours without needing to be plugged in. Not a bad value, but it is beaten by the Sony Vaio SV-T1312, which can run for about 2 hours longer.

When browsing via WLAN (energy savings mode, screen brightness about 150 cd/m²), the battery life goes down to 4 hours and 32 minutes.  Our standardized test script opens different web pages and HD videos in intervals of 40 seconds, in order to simulate such a realistic scenario.

Fortunately, maximum CPU and GPU performance is also available in battery mode. However, in our Battery Eater Classic test (maximum output, maximum brightness, radio modules on), the user will have to connect the device to a mains socket after 2 hours.  For the subsequent charging procedure, one should schedule approximately two and a half hours.

Maximum battery life (Reader's Test)
Maximum battery life (Reader's Test)
Minimum battery life (Classic Test)
Minimum battery life (Classic Test)
Charging procedure
Charging procedure
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 58min
WiFi Surfing
4h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 58min

Verdict

Wie wir testen - Fazit

Asus VivoBook S300CA-C1016H
Asus VivoBook S300CA-C1016H

"Is this made by Apple?" This question was raised a few times by the author of the review - Asus can take this as a compliment. The light alloy case would also be appropriate for more expensive rivals of the VivoBook S300CA.  Altogether, the general impression of the quality is superb, apart from the clumsily integrated touchpad. With long battery life and an above average keyboard the user is compensated for that flaw.

One has to decide for himself whether the additional touchscreen is really necessary and to what extent - some customers would rather have a matte display which is usable outdoors. In any case, the limited upgrade options are points of criticism. Only 4 GB of soldered RAM could prove to be a bottleneck in the near future. In addition, Asus' cooling system operates fairly close to its limits, meaning that the possibility of throttling cannot be excluded, especially during the hot seasons.

Nevertheless: For a price of under 600 Euros (~$787), one receives an attractive and mobile subnotebook with the S300CA. If one is looking for a device with a similar concept, higher computing power and fast SSD, the Sony Vaio SV-T1312V1ES might be of interest.

Read all 11 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
In Review: Asus VivoBook S300CA
In Review: Asus VivoBook S300CA

Specifications

Asus VivoBook S300CA (VivoBook S300 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i3-3217U 2 x 1.8 GHz, Ivy Bridge
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 4000, Core: 1050 MHz, Memory: 800 MHz, 9.17.10.2875
Memory
4 GB 
, 1x 4 GB DDR3-1600, soldered
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, capacitive, CMO N133BGE-L41, TN-Panel, LED-Backlight, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel HM76 (Panther Point)
Storage
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380, 500 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 8 MB Cache
Soundcard
Intel Panther Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset Interface (3.5mm jack), Card Reader: SD Card Reader
Networking
Atheros AR8161/8165 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros AR9485 WiFi Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 331 x 234 ( = 0.83 x 13.03 x 9.21 in)
Battery
48 Wh Lithium-Polymer, non-removable
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 65-Watt power adapters, manuals, mouse, different Asus tools, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.76 kg ( = 62.08 oz / 3.88 pounds), Power Supply: 150 g ( = 5.29 oz / 0.33 pounds)
Price
600 Euro

 

An ultrabook is too expensive for you?
An ultrabook is too expensive for you?
with a heat emission that pushes the cooling system to its limits.
with a heat emission that pushes the cooling system to its limits.
Different LEDs indicate the operating status.
Different LEDs indicate the operating status.
We would have expected a little bit more from the sound system…
We would have expected a little bit more from the sound system…
the sound remains flat and there is a lack of bass.
the sound remains flat and there is a lack of bass.
With a little bit of skill and the correct screwdriver…
With a little bit of skill and the correct screwdriver…
the bottom cover can be removed.
the bottom cover can be removed.
However, there aren't many upgrade options:
However, there aren't many upgrade options:
The main memory was soldered on the board.
The main memory was soldered on the board.
But the hard drive can be swapped…
But the hard drive can be swapped…
as well as the WLAN module.
as well as the WLAN module.
The fan is also accessible.
The fan is also accessible.
An integrated 44 Wh battery provides up to 7 hours of battery life.
An integrated 44 Wh battery provides up to 7 hours of battery life.
A compact power adapter is responsible for the charging procedure…
A compact power adapter is responsible for the charging procedure…
Inside, there is a Core i3-3217U...
Inside, there is a Core i3-3217U...
Apart from that, the overall quality of the case is convincing.
Apart from that, the overall quality of the case is convincing.
if it wasn't for a small flaw in workmanship.
if it wasn't for a small flaw in workmanship.
Then the Asus VivoBook S300CA could be a possible alternative.
Then the Asus VivoBook S300CA could be a possible alternative.
It is already available for under 600 Euros (~$787)…
It is already available for under 600 Euros (~$787)…
and offers a similarly slim case.
and offers a similarly slim case.
Despite the bargain price…
Despite the bargain price…
the manufacturer uses high-quality aluminum.
the manufacturer uses high-quality aluminum.
A further characteristic:
A further characteristic:
The display is equipped with a touchscreen.
The display is equipped with a touchscreen.
The new tile surface in Windows 8…
The new tile surface in Windows 8…
can be operated even more intuitively.
can be operated even more intuitively.
Apart from two USB 2.0 ports…
Apart from two USB 2.0 ports…
Asus has also built in a fast USB 3.0 port.
Asus has also built in a fast USB 3.0 port.
Gigabit LAN is also part of the package.
Gigabit LAN is also part of the package.
Keyboard and touchpad leave a good impression altogether…
Keyboard and touchpad leave a good impression altogether…
with 65 Watt.
with 65 Watt.

Similar devices

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Review Update Dell XPS 13 L322X Ultrabook
HD Graphics 4000, Core i5 3337U
Review Google Chromebook Pixel Notebook
HD Graphics 4000, Core i5 3427U
Review Dell XPS 13 Ultrabook (Late 2012)
HD Graphics 4000, Core i7 3517U

Review Library

  • Other internal reviews

  • Available external reviews sorted by display size

  • Available external reviews sorted by graphics processor
  • Search reviews in the extensive review library at notebookCHECK.com

Links

Price Comparison

Pros

+Solid light alloy case
+Good keyboard
+Long battery life
+Low heat emission
+Touchscreen
+USB 3.0
 

Cons

-Display with poor viewing angles
-Throttling under full load
-Low 3D performance
-Reduced upgrade options
-Slanted touchpad on the review unit

Shortcut

What we like

A sophisticated light alloy case, long battery life - the S300CA offers similar advantages as some higher priced ultrabooks. Those who value a touchscreen display will find the inexpensive 13-inch device appealing.

What we'd like to see

The performance of applications could be further increased with an SSD. Unfortunately, one would have to remove the built-in hard drive, as there is no mSATA slot.

What surprised us

It is not the first time that we find a skewed touchpad in an Asus notebook. If the manufacturer manages to solve this problem, then there are no other points of criticism regarding the workmanship.

The competition

Comparable touchscreen models are also offered by Sony (Vaio SV-T1312) and Acer (Aspire V5 Series). If one can live without this feature, then the Acer Aspire S3Fujitsu LifeBook UH572Samsung 535U3C or the Lenovo IdeaPad U310 represent possible alternatives.

Rating

Asus VivoBook S300CA - 04/04/2013 v3(old)
Till Schönborn

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
84%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
66%
Weight
90%
Battery
89%
Display
75%
Games Performance
63%
Application Performance
87%
Temperature
78%
Noise
89%
Add Points
75%
Average
80%
83%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Till Schönborn, 2013-04-15 (Update: 2018-05-15)