Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a powerful Hawk Point family processor (APU) released in April 2024. The R9 PRO 8945HS is identical to the "normal" R9 8945HS in virtually all respects; both come with 8 Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz (16 processing threads), a 16-TOPS Ryzen AI NPU (higher clock speeds) and the top-of-the-line Radeon 780M graphics adapter. Other key features include PCIe 4 and USB 4 support, LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support and 16 MB of L3 cache. Unlike the R9 8945HS however this PRO series chip has ECC memory support and the Secure Processor feature which in a nutshell is an ARM co-processor built into the main chip.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point APUs are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, just like Dragon Range, Phoenix and Raphael processors are. With this product family, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger registers/buffers/caches (reportedly at the cost of some of them becoming slightly slower), is supposed to bring an IPC improvement of around 13%.

Elsewhere, the R9 PRO 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600 with ECC support optionally present depending on the socket). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HSAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.3 pt (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.7 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (75%)     max: 675 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (76%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5809 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39747 Points (29%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
362.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
21172 Points (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.2 GB/s (37%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
571 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (66%)     max: 2620 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1925 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86267 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
61.6 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 14. 05:33:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17472 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1739507630s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:56:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17472 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 17472 +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)