Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3350U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 3 3300U, the 3350U offers the same specifications according to AMD.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3350U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3350UAMD Ryzen 3 3300U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 3350U

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
27.5 pt (31%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
337 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
921 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
471 Points (5%)
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
134 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4280 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12357 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
404.6 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2398 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
12118 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3340 MIPS (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
132.1 fps (31%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.8 fps (6%)
01234567Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.7 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1212 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4332 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.8 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
709 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4587 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51741 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
47170 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
55407 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3953 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5629 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2006 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
864 Points (37%)
824 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2455 Points (9%)
2578 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
843 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2722 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3861 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10787 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3672 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10223 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
10170 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3469 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11467 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3780 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6808 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12111 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8746 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9508 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.5 (1%)     max: 1281 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
136.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27764 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 141     avg: 153.5     median: 153.5 (41%)     max: 166 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3350U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 100% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 30. 16:12:29

#0 checking url part for id 13237 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11181 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:15:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.011s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13237 +0s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 13237 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11181 +0.006s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 11181 +0.009s ... 0.033s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.04s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.041s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.044s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.044s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.01s ... 0.056s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.056s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#68 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.076s

#69 return log +0.004s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)