NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

► remove

Performance workstation grafic chip with DirectX 10 support and OpenGL 2.1 support. Probaby, it bases upon the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT.

It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, geologic scientists and other professional 3D applications.

The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) and DCC applications (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offer a 12-bit precision for subpixel, full image-antialiasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for dots and lines and additional drivers are for CAD and DCC optimized settings.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570MNVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M (compare) 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M (compare) 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M (compare) 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M (compare) 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M (compare) 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M (compare) 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M (compare) 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M (compare) 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M (compare) 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M (compare) 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M (compare) 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M (compare) 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M (compare) 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M (compare) 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M (compare) 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M (compare) 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M (compare) 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M (compare) 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M (compare) 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M (compare) 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M (compare) 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M (compare) 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG64GLMNB8M-GLM
ArchitectureG8x
32 - 16 -
Core475 MHz400 MHz
Shader950 MHz800 MHz
Memory700 MHz600 MHz
Bus128 Bit64 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory256 MB256 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors289 Million210 Million
Technology80 nm80 nm
Size
Introduced01.06.2007 09.05.2007
Powermizer 7.0, CG Shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PureVideo HD, PCI-E interface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full image antialiasing
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/geforce_8400M....
FeaturesPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 24479     avg: 26907.5     median: 26907 (28%)     max: 29336 Points
min: 13650     avg: 15053.5     median: 15053 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 11586     avg: 11957.5     median: 11957 (6%)     max: 12329 Points
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 7674     avg: 7790.3     median: 7700 (14%)     max: 7997 Points
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (6%)     max: 3379 Points
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 51%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
436  fps
75%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
128  fps
48%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
19 22 24 29 43 43 45 49 ~ 34 fps
50%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
Quadro FX 570M:
»
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
118  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
116.7  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
111.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
89.7  fps
Quadro FX 570M:
»
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
501  fps
48%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps
Quadro FX 570M:
»
Quadro FX 360M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 56%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)