NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove

The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M, which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GLM2NB9E-GLM3
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Cores48 - unified128 - unified
Core530 MHz550 MHz
Shader1325 MHz1375 MHz
Memory800 MHz800 MHz
Bus256 Bit256 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors504 Million754 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HDOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Size2/32/3
Introduced14.08.2008 14.08.2008
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
36280 Points (38%)
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (27%)     max: 14998 Points
15759 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
25.5 fps (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
32 fps (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
34.6 fps (73%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
29.8 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
54.6 fps (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
22 fps (57%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
26.4 fps (54%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 116%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.13
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)