Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M, which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).

Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to  consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.

At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GLM2NB9E-GLM3N10E-GLM4
ArchitectureG9xG9xG9x
Pipelines48 - unified128 - unified128 - unified
Core Speed530 MHz550 MHz675 MHz
Shader Speed1325 MHz1375 MHz1688 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption65 Watt75 Watt100 Watt
Transistors504 Million754 Million754 Million
technology65 nm65 nm55 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HDOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement14.08.2008 14.08.2008 20.12.2009
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
5053 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 6584     avg: 6951     median: 6779 (2%)     max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4326 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 5758     avg: 5926     median: 6002 (3%)     max: 6019 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
36280 Points (38%)
min: 32886     avg: 34790     median: 34790 (36%)     max: 36694 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
min: 33146     avg: 37082     median: 38191 (20%)     max: 39909 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (16%)     max: 14998 Points
15759 Points (17%)
min: 16593     avg: 18199     median: 18043 (20%)     max: 19960 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7580 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
13232 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7660 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
min: 10430     avg: 10847     median: 11000 (15%)     max: 11111 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 12050     avg: 12765     median: 12923 (18%)     max: 13323 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
25.5 Points (53%)
32.8 Points (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
32 Points (67%)
45.8 Points (96%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
34.6 Points (73%)
47.4 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.6 Points (32%)
59.7 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
29.8 Points (58%)
51.1 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
54.6 Points (81%)
59.7 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
22 Points (57%)
38.5 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
26.4 Points (54%)
35.3 Points (72%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (31%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (37%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (29%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (28%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4394 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4481 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 4429     avg: 4928     median: 4928 (4%)     max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
29.8 fps (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 32.07     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (12%)     max: 33.29 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 144% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 180% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3800M:
97  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
82  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.19
log 28. 22:36:02

#0 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 885 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 26 Nov 2022 16:28:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.062s ... 0.062s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.062s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0.045s ... 0.107s

#9 got single benchmarks 883 +0.007s ... 0.114s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 885 +0s ... 0.114s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.115s

#12 got single benchmarks 885 +0.006s ... 0.121s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0s ... 0.121s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.125s

#15 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.006s ... 0.131s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.132s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.132s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.136s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.137s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.138s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.138s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.139s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.14s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.14s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.141s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.141s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.143s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.143s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.143s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.145s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#70 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.146s

#71 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.146s

#72 Got 16 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.149s

#73 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.149s

#74 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.15s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.151s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.151s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.152s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.153s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.153s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#86 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.155s

#87 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.155s

#88 return log +0.001s ... 0.156s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)