Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.

The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.

Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GLM2NB10-GLM3
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines48 - unified96 - unified
Core Speed530 MHz600 MHz
Shader Speed1325 MHz1500 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption65 Watt75 Watt
Transistors504 Million754 Million
technology65 nm55 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HDOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement14.08.2008 01.12.2009
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 5779     avg: 5783     median: 5783 (2%)     max: 5787 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 5000     avg: 5037     median: 5037 (3%)     max: 5074 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
36280 Points (38%)
34844 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
33900 Points (18%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (16%)     max: 14998 Points
min: 16310     avg: 16936     median: 16935.5 (20%)     max: 17561 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7580 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7660 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 11162     avg: 11359     median: 11358.5 (16%)     max: 11555 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.3 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
39 Points (82%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
44 Points (93%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
42.6 Points (83%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.5 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
35.2 Points (91%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
31.3 Points (64%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 13.58     avg: 14.7     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 16.55 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 15.1     avg: 16     median: 15.3 (26%)     max: 17.4 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 6.73     avg: 14.1     median: 7.5 (9%)     max: 28 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.67     avg: 5.1     median: 4.7 (19%)     max: 5.89 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.2     avg: 7     median: 7.4 (6%)     max: 7.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 7.99     avg: 16.2     median: 8.5 (9%)     max: 32 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10.8     avg: 11.9     median: 11.1 (5%)     max: 13.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 9.53     avg: 13.4     median: 9.7 (12%)     max: 20.92 fps
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
6.8 Points (100%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
6.8 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4394 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 28.16     avg: 28.8     median: 28.8 (10%)     max: 29.36 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 154% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
63.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
56.1  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
48.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
158  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
60  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
52  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
29.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
23.1  fps
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
78.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
66.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.2  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
96.3  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
89.5  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
62.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.7  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 22:15:01

#0 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1544 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:27:11 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.076s ... 0.076s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.079s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.079s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.079s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.079s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0.028s ... 0.107s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.108s

#27 got single benchmarks 883 +0.006s ... 0.113s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 1544 +0s ... 0.114s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#30 got single benchmarks 1544 +0.006s ... 0.12s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.12s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.121s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#86 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.132s

#87 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.132s

#88 Got 19 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.136s

#89 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.136s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#101 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.137s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.138s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.138s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.139s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.14s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.141s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#121 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.141s

#122 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.141s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.084s ... 0.225s

#124 return log +0.002s ... 0.227s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)