Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Pro A12-8800B vs AMD A10-9600P vs AMD FX-9830P

AMD Pro A12-8800B

► remove from comparison AMD Pro A12-8800B

The AMD Pro A12-8800B is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for business laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). It is similar to the consumer version, the FX-8800P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (based on the similar FX-8800P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU. See more benchmarks on our FX-8800P page.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A10-9600P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9600P

The AMD A10-9600P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

ModelAMD Pro A12-8800BAMD A10-9600PAMD FX-9830P
CodenameCarrizoBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B « 2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2100 - 3400 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt45 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
SocketFP4 BGA
FeaturesHSA 1.0Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 206.7     median: 206 (1%)     max: 212 Points
min: 195     avg: 211     median: 216 (1%)     max: 217 Points
301 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 71     avg: 73.3     median: 72 (20%)     max: 77 Points
min: 70     avg: 74.8     median: 76 (21%)     max: 77 Points
93 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.58 Points
min: 2.59     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.6 Points
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.93 Points
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.9 Points
1.1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2183     avg: 2236     median: 2236 (14%)     max: 2289 Points
min: 2340     avg: 2439     median: 2447 (15%)     max: 2520 Points
3033 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6009     avg: 6220     median: 6219.5 (5%)     max: 6430 Points
min: 5913     avg: 6467     median: 6508 (5%)     max: 6939 Points
9822 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7270     avg: 8224     median: 8224 (5%)     max: 9178 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3015     avg: 3057     median: 3057 (4%)     max: 3099 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 502     avg: 517     median: 516.5 (6%)     max: 531 s
534 s (6%)
315.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.19     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 16.79 s
15.3 s (3%)
10.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1293     avg: 1336     median: 1336 (2%)     max: 1379 Points
1526 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15.84     avg: 15.9     median: 15.8 (5%)     max: 15.85 fps
16.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 72     avg: 75.9     median: 75.9 (17%)     max: 79.7 fps
85.4 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.195     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (6%)     max: 0.205 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.313     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.328 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.5     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (4%)     max: 1.6 GB/s
1.5 GB/s (4%)
2 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2715     avg: 2871     median: 2769 (6%)     max: 3130 Points
min: 2969     avg: 3224     median: 3287 (7%)     max: 3352 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.7 s
18.7 s (4%)
18.6 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 42     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (2%)     max: 45.77 s
41.3 s (2%)
43.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 898     avg: 935     median: 934.5 (4%)     max: 971 s
942 s (4%)
870 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6609     avg: 6624     median: 6623.5 (5%)     max: 6638 Points
min: 7115     avg: 7516     median: 7515.5 (6%)     max: 7916 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2228     avg: 2375     median: 2361 (6%)     max: 2536 Points
min: 2246     avg: 2418     median: 2387 (6%)     max: 2634 Points
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 23849     avg: 24509     median: 24550 (20%)     max: 25128 Points
min: 21570     avg: 23140     median: 23093 (19%)     max: 24803 Points
34521 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 21853     avg: 23645     median: 23645 (19%)     max: 25437 Points
min: 18940     avg: 21504     median: 21065.5 (17%)     max: 24944 Points
31580 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25429     avg: 25705     median: 25705 (21%)     max: 25981 Points
min: 22601     avg: 25235     median: 26061 (22%)     max: 26217 Points
34398 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1779     avg: 1920     median: 1850 (5%)     max: 2130 Points
min: 1722     avg: 2000     median: 2031.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
2945 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2293     avg: 2639     median: 2560 (5%)     max: 3064 Points
min: 2455     avg: 2912     median: 2981 (5%)     max: 3229 Points
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1045 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2047 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4711 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
4691 Points (8%)
min: 5252     avg: 5386     median: 5423 (10%)     max: 5445 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1969 Points (38%)
min: 2000     avg: 2064     median: 2074 (41%)     max: 2109 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4949 Points (8%)
5702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2079 Points (31%)
2237 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2093     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (4%)     max: 4211 ms
min: 2098     avg: 2251     median: 2328 (3%)     max: 2328 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 139.7     avg: 165.4     median: 165.4 (2%)     max: 191 ms
min: 133.3     avg: 138.2     median: 133.3 (1%)     max: 148.1 ms
123.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
7621 Points (6%)
min: 18921     avg: 19501     median: 19791 (15%)     max: 19791 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A12-8800B → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9600P → 104% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 136% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 16:09:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7007 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8094 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751033354s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7007 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 7007 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#13 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.06s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)