Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD FX-9830P

AMD Pro A10-8700B

► remove from comparison AMD Pro A10-8700B

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

It is similar to the consumer version, the A10-8700P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

ModelAMD Pro A10-8700BAMD FX-9830P
CodenameCarrizoBristol Ridge
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-8800P compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B « 1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1800 - 3200 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
SocketFP4 BGA
FeaturesHSA 1.0Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
192 Points (1%)
301 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
70 Points (19%)
93 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.3 Points (3%)
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (19%)
1.1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2200 Points (13%)
3033 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5907 Points (4%)
9822 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
949 s (11%)
315.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.7 s (6%)
10.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
897 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.1 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
45.4 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
2 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2798 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43.1 s (9%)
18.6 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
94.7 s (4%)
43.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1994 s (9%)
870 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2096     avg: 2124     median: 2123.5 (5%)     max: 2151 Points
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
21226 Points (17%)
34521 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
31580 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
34398 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1870 Points (5%)
2945 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1375     avg: 1976     median: 1975.5 (4%)     max: 2576 Points
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
675 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2728 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
950 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2906 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1030 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2262     avg: 3038     median: 3038 (4%)     max: 3814 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 181.6     avg: 193.4     median: 193.4 (2%)     max: 205.1 ms
123.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9042     avg: 12632     median: 12632 (10%)     max: 16222 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A10-8700B → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 197% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 04:47:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7008 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750906075s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7008 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 7008 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.034s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)