Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

► remove from comparison Intel P9500

The Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9400 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9500 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.

The P9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2530 MHz2800 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$348 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2758     avg: 2944     median: 2901 (26%)     max: 3234 Points
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5245     avg: 5607     median: 5501.5 (8%)     max: 6104 Points
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.5 s (6%)
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1687     avg: 2198     median: 2311 (5%)     max: 2350 Points
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.67     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.31 s
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 42.49     avg: 43.2     median: 43.2 (2%)     max: 43.91 s
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1101 s (5%)
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23667 MIPS (11%)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
17820 MFLOPS (14%)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4598     avg: 6203     median: 6250 (39%)     max: 7387 Points
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.4 Points (77%)
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5060     avg: 5142     median: 5157 (5%)     max: 5210 Points
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 106% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 09. 22:49:43

#0 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0s ... 0.007s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#47 got single benchmarks 405 +0.015s ... 0.023s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.023s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#50 got single benchmarks 397 +0.013s ... 0.037s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.038s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#124 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.046s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#126 return log +0.004s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)