, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron N2815

Intel Celeron N2820

► remove from comparison Intel N2820

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2820 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2820 even competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-2500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove from comparison Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2815
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock2170 - 2390 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), Wireless Display, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2815

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N2820
9.8 pt (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
347 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
173 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
79 Points (10%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
143 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 46     avg: 58     median: 58 (1%)     max: 70 Points
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55.5 (1%)     max: 62 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 26     avg: 34.3     median: 37.9 (13%)     max: 39 Points
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (11%)     max: 34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.51     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 0.62     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.29     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.43 Points
min: 0.32     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 900     avg: 1061     median: 1061 (9%)     max: 1222 Points
1068 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1635     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (3%)     max: 2385 Points
2038 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3243 Points (3%)
2781 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1672 Points (10%)
1509 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1543 s (18%)
1818 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
48.5 s (10%)
57.8 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
675 Points (4%)
594 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
2891 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
1643 MIPS (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.8 fps (3%)
4.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (7%)
24.1 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N2820 +
0.4 fps (1%)
000.10.10.20.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.60.60.60.70.70.8Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N2820 +
9415 Seconds (66%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N2820 +
3.1 sec (67%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2820 +
1418 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
36.5 s (8%)
42.3 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
81.4 s (3%)
92.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1696 s (8%)
1965 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
967 Points (3%)
min: 850     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (3%)     max: 893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
5790 Points (4%)
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (4%)     max: 9547 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
10079 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
12137 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 196     avg: 521     median: 520.5 (1%)     max: 845 Points
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2815 +
1017 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2406 Points (19%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2077 Points (19%)
1950 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2008 Points (4%)
1747 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2304 Points (5%)
1993 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2165 Points (6%)
1917 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1553 Points (3%)
1343 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
879 Points (18%)
781 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1677 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
950 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (13%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1761     avg: 1763     median: 1762.5 (2%)     max: 1764 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
4659 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 372.9     avg: 522     median: 521.8 (6%)     max: 670.6 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
41.1 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2820 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 91% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 19:44:44

#0 checking url part for id 4991 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4989 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 4991 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#25 got single benchmarks 4991 +0.01s ... 0.026s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 4989 +0s ... 0.027s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#28 got single benchmarks 4989 +0.007s ... 0.034s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.041s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.017s ... 0.067s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#123 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.087s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.023s ... 0.11s

#125 return log +0.004s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)