Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron N2815 vs Intel Celeron N2920

Intel Celeron N2820

► remove from comparison Intel N2820

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2820 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2820 even competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-2500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove from comparison Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove from comparison Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

ModelIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2815Intel Celeron N2920
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock2170 - 2390 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz1860 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 24 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), Wireless Display, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless Display
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2815Intel Celeron N2920

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N2820
9.7 pt (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
347 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
173 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
79 Points (10%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
143 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 46     avg: 58     median: 58 (1%)     max: 70 Points
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55.5 (1%)     max: 62 Points
min: 116     avg: 118.5     median: 118.5 (1%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 26     avg: 34.3     median: 37.9 (13%)     max: 39 Points
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (11%)     max: 34 Points
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (11%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.51     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 0.62     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.76 Points
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (3%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.29     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.43 Points
min: 0.32     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4 Points
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.38 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 900     avg: 1061     median: 1061 (9%)     max: 1222 Points
1068 Points (10%)
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (9%)     max: 1049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1635     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (3%)     max: 2385 Points
2038 Points (3%)
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (5%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3243 Points (3%)
2781 Points (2%)
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (5%)     max: 5244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1672 Points (10%)
1509 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1543 s (18%)
1818 s (21%)
962 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
48.5 s (10%)
57.8 s (12%)
32 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
675 Points (4%)
594 Points (3%)
1728 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
2891 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
1643 MIPS (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.8 fps (3%)
4.5 fps (2%)
8.4 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (7%)
24.1 fps (7%)
42.1 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N2820 +
0.4 fps (1%)
000.10.10.20.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.60.60.60.70.70.8Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (1%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N2820 +
9415 Seconds (66%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N2820 +
3.1 sec (67%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2820 +
1418 Points (3%)
131%
1 N2920 +
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (4%)     max: 1900 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
36.5 s (8%)
42.4 s (9%)
43.7 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
81.4 s (3%)
92.7 s (4%)
95 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1696 s (8%)
1965 s (9%)
2035 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N2920 +
3606 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
967 Points (3%)
min: 850     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (3%)     max: 893 Points
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (5%)     max: 1679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
5790 Points (4%)
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (4%)     max: 9547 Points
15979 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
10079 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
12137 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 196     avg: 521     median: 520.5 (1%)     max: 845 Points
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
1355 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2815 +
1017 Points (2%)
192%
1 N2920 +
1952 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2820 +
2406 Points (19%)
91%
1 N2815 +
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2820 +
2077 Points (19%)
94%
1 N2815 +
1950 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2820 +
2008 Points (4%)
87%
1 N2815 +
1747 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2820 +
2304 Points (5%)
87%
1 N2815 +
1993 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2820 +
2165 Points (6%)
89%
1 N2815 +
1917 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1553 Points (3%)
86%
1 N2815 +
1343 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
879 Points (18%)
89%
1 N2815 +
781 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1677 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
950 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (13%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1761     avg: 1763     median: 1762.5 (2%)     max: 1764 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
4659 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 372.9     avg: 522     median: 522 (6%)     max: 671 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
41.1 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2820 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 92% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 153% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 18. 16:29:17

#0 checking url part for id 4991 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4993 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.016s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#33 composed specs +0s ... 0.016s

#34 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#35 getting avg benchmarks for device 4991 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#38 got single benchmarks 4991 +0.009s ... 0.028s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 4989 +0s ... 0.029s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#41 got single benchmarks 4989 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 4993 +0s ... 0.036s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#44 got single benchmarks 4993 +0.007s ... 0.043s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.05s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.017s ... 0.08s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.085s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.088s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.092s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.095s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.098s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#152 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.101s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.103s

#165 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#168 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.104s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.105s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.106s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.106s

#174 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.107s

#175 return log +0s ... 0.107s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)