Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) vs HiSilicon Kirin 820

HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.36 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.95 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (2 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clocked at up to 700 MHz. Compared to the 4G version, the 5G Kirin 990 integrates a Balong 5G modem and is slightly higher clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 5G is produced in the modern 7nm (7FF+ with EUV) process at TSMC, the 4G version is still produced in the slightly older 7nm process as the Kirin 980.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865+ (Plus)

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in mid 2020. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 3.1 GHz and three additional ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 865 is the faster clocked Prime Core and 10% higher clocked GPU.

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865+ can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 and 865 Plus does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is still called Adreno 650 and should offer 10% more performance than the Adreno 650 in the Snapdragon 865 (thanks to higher clock speed).

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers a KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is also untouched. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 855+ is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 990 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)HiSilicon Kirin 820
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock <=2860 MHz2420 - 3100 MHz1840 - 2360 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Transistors10300 Million
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), Balong 5G ModemAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory ControllerARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 700 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 646 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP6
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) « 2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8652.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
TDP5 Watt
Manufacturerwww.hisilicon.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990 5G
min: 1.102     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (85%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865+ (Plus)
min: 1.165     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (90%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
0.9 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22857     avg: 35317     median: 35840.5 (29%)     max: 46731 Points
41610 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2497     avg: 4729     median: 5326 (50%)     max: 5766 Points
4642 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4836     avg: 5318     median: 5358 (61%)     max: 5721 Points
4637 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 755     avg: 771     median: 772.5 (26%)     max: 783 Points
642 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2972     avg: 3077     median: 3076.5 (6%)     max: 3183 Points
2434 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
769 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3083 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3915     avg: 3925     median: 3925 (39%)     max: 3935 Points
4493 Points (45%)
3113 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12324     avg: 12549     median: 12549 (12%)     max: 12774 Points
13066 Points (13%)
9860 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3984     avg: 3992     median: 3991.5 (44%)     max: 3999 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11812     avg: 12006     median: 12005.5 (16%)     max: 12199 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1615     avg: 2579     median: 2578.5 (14%)     max: 3542 Points
4235 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 4881     avg: 5643     median: 5643 (39%)     max: 6405 Points
5223 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 19287     avg: 20143     median: 20143 (39%)     max: 20999 Points
17014 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 9013     avg: 9236     median: 9235.5 (19%)     max: 9458 Points
7277 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 11042     avg: 11669     median: 11668.5 (31%)     max: 12295 Points
9969 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1914     avg: 2084     median: 2066.5 (2%)     max: 2287 ms
min: 1854     avg: 1908     median: 1915.5 (2%)     max: 1947 ms
2254 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
345.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20917     avg: 22323     median: 22343 (15%)     max: 23690 Points
min: 25953     avg: 26679     median: 26700.5 (18%)     max: 27360 Points
19727 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 95     avg: 105.7     median: 98 (18%)     max: 124 Points
min: 114     avg: 119.8     median: 119.5 (21%)     max: 126 Points
115 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 67274     avg: 75033     median: 73056 (61%)     max: 86746 Points
min: 88971     avg: 94678     median: 93828.5 (78%)     max: 102085 Points
68406 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 66292     avg: 98762     median: 103022 (83%)     max: 122714 Points
min: 89245     avg: 96058     median: 93220.5 (75%)     max: 108544 Points
52226 Points (42%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 159628     avg: 167229     median: 167842 (31%)     max: 173605 Points
min: 151143     avg: 216590     median: 237021 (44%)     max: 241176 Points
117476 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 136344     avg: 145447     median: 145294 (53%)     max: 154856 Points
min: 153754     avg: 164286     median: 162562 (59%)     max: 178268 Points
131099 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 450373     avg: 486472     median: 483829 (47%)     max: 527856 Points
min: 490260     avg: 571612     median: 586650 (57%)     max: 622888 Points
369207 Points (36%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
238069 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 5869     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (40%)     max: 9437 Points
min: 7692     avg: 7804     median: 7803.5 (41%)     max: 7915 Points
8006 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
29206 Points (62%)
min: 19601     avg: 20152     median: 20152 (43%)     max: 20703 Points
22692 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8512     avg: 10025     median: 10038.5 (66%)     max: 11509 Points
9527 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 10628     avg: 12766     median: 12810 (64%)     max: 14814 Points
13099 Points (66%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) → 111% n=19

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 88% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 02. 11:30:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11508 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12716 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762079423s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Nov 2025 05:19:33 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11508 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 11508 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12716 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 12716 +0.008s ... 0.03s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.05s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.051s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.051s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.051s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.052s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.052s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.073s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)