Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 820e vs HiSilicon Kirin 990

HiSilicon Kirin 820e

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820e

The HiSilicon Kirin 820e is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced 2022 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.22 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2 and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.84 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU. Compared to the similar named Kirin 820, the 820e offers slower clocked CPU cores on a level with the older Kirin 810.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 990

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.09 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.86 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (1 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clcoked at up to 600 MHz. Compared to the 5G version, the 4G Kirin 990 integrates a fast 4G modem and is slightly lower clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 820eHiSilicon Kirin 990
SeriesHiSilicon HiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e « 1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 « - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock1840 - 2220 MHz <=2860 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.22 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), 4G Modem
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP6ARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.hisilicon.com
Transistors8000 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990
min: 1.067     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (82%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19565     avg: 31512     median: 31512 (27%)     max: 43459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
3725 Points (44%)
min: 4756     avg: 5166     median: 5166 (61%)     max: 5576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4702     avg: 4918     median: 4917.5 (56%)     max: 5133 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
566 Points (24%)
min: 759     avg: 770     median: 770 (32%)     max: 781 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1853 Points (3%)
min: 2893     avg: 2978     median: 2977.5 (5%)     max: 3062 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3059 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2820 Points (28%)
min: 3865     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (39%)     max: 3898 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7841 Points (9%)
min: 11885     avg: 12083     median: 12082.5 (13%)     max: 12280 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2834 Points (39%)
3910 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7461 Points (18%)
11615 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6933 Points (11%)
10281 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2344 Points (35%)
3272 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3891 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5595 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
19729 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
9053 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11581 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2174 ms (3%)
min: 1963     avg: 2154     median: 2154 (3%)     max: 2345 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
18755 Points (17%)
min: 19885     avg: 21727     median: 21726.5 (20%)     max: 23568 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
64 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
86 Points (18%)
min: 97     avg: 108     median: 108 (23%)     max: 119 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 70955     avg: 85363     median: 85363 (71%)     max: 99771 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 62954     avg: 81672     median: 81672 (66%)     max: 100390 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 110095     avg: 135414     median: 135414 (25%)     max: 160733 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 136219     avg: 143683     median: 143682 (52%)     max: 151146 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 409039     avg: 446132     median: 446132 (43%)     max: 483224 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
287379 Points (17%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
95606 Points (26%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
3553 Points (0%)
261357 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 5756     avg: 7469     median: 7469 (39%)     max: 9182 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
29072 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8636     avg: 9479     median: 9479 (62%)     max: 10322 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 10918     avg: 12433     median: 12432.5 (62%)     max: 13947 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
552 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820e → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 → 693% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 15:15:59

#0 checking url part for id 14536 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11510 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.086s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.086s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14536 +0.003s ... 0.088s

#7 got single benchmarks 14536 +0.007s ... 0.095s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11510 +0.013s ... 0.109s

#9 got single benchmarks 11510 +0.009s ... 0.118s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.107s ... 0.225s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.25s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)