Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

HiSilicon Kirin 710

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710

The HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2018 and contains 8 processor cores (4x Cortex-A73 at up to 2.2 GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.7 GHz, BigLITTLE), an ARM Mali G51 MP4, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller and a LTE radio (600 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up). Therefore, the CPU part is similar to the Kirin 960 and 970 (both higher clocked), but the graphics card is a lot slower. 

The Kirin 710 is manufactured at TSMC in 12 nm (compared to the 16nm Kirin 960 and 10nm Kirin 970).

The HiSilicon Kirin 710F is the same chip with a different package (FCCSP - Flip Chip Chip Scale Package) and offers the same specifications (see e.g. our review of the Huawei P Smart Z).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock2200 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Transistors5500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710
0.5 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11158     avg: 16572     median: 17232.5 (15%)     max: 22668 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 330     avg: 330.5     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 331 Points
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1320     avg: 1338     median: 1338 (2%)     max: 1356 Points
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 319     avg: 327     median: 327 (1%)     max: 335 Points
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1266     avg: 1339     median: 1339 (4%)     max: 1412 Points
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1612     avg: 1623     median: 1623 (22%)     max: 1634 Points
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5377     avg: 5447     median: 5447 (13%)     max: 5517 Points
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5456 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1517 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1356     avg: 1702     median: 1701.5 (14%)     max: 2047 Points
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2488     avg: 3017     median: 3017 (27%)     max: 3546 Points
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 9096     avg: 9764     median: 9763.5 (19%)     max: 10431 Points
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 4429     avg: 4767     median: 4766.5 (10%)     max: 5104 Points
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 5366     avg: 5857     median: 5856.5 (15%)     max: 6347 Points
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3999     avg: 4223     median: 4205 (5%)     max: 4853 ms
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9041     avg: 9659     median: 9695 (9%)     max: 10544 Points
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 52     avg: 61.7     median: 62 (13%)     max: 69 Points
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 104012     avg: 108955     median: 110126 (38%)     max: 112870 Points
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 124870     avg: 139210     median: 135942 (24%)     max: 183420 Points
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55985     avg: 58317     median: 58317 (49%)     max: 60649 Points
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 35479     avg: 36250     median: 36250 (29%)     max: 37021 Points
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 28697     avg: 28859     median: 28858.5 (5%)     max: 29020 Points
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 60900     avg: 66675     median: 66674.5 (24%)     max: 72449 Points
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 185725     avg: 190100     median: 190100 (18%)     max: 194475 Points
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 181152     avg: 184162     median: 184162 (24%)     max: 187172 Points
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3783     avg: 4945     median: 5171.5 (27%)     max: 5286 Points
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 10592     avg: 11047     median: 11046.5 (24%)     max: 11501 Points
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
6514 Points (30%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 96% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 09:32:00

#0 checking url part for id 10172 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.06s ... 0.061s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.061s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10172 +0.015s ... 0.075s

#7 got single benchmarks 10172 +0.047s ... 0.122s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.012s ... 0.134s

#9 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.046s ... 0.18s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.18s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.102s ... 0.281s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.126s ... 0.407s

#13 return log +0.034s ... 0.441s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)