Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Mediatek MT8766B vs HiSilicon Kirin 655

HiSilicon Kirin 658

► remove from comparison  Kirin 658

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.35 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison  Helio MT8766B

The Mediatek MT8766B is an entry-level ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets (mainly Android-based) that was introduced in 2020. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz. and a PowerVR GE6300 GPU. It looks very similar to the older Helio A20 (-200 MHz CPU core clock).

The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x. Furthermore, a LTE radio with Cat-4 DL (150 Mbps download) and Cat-5 UL (75 Mbps upload) and a 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 5 modem is integrated.

The SoC should be produced in the same 12nm process as the Helio A20 (most likely the same chip).

HiSilicon Kirin 655

► remove from comparison  Kirin 655

The HiSilicon Kirin 655 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.1 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 is the 100 MHz higher clock speed of the performance cores.

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz or 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 658Mediatek MT8766BHiSilicon Kirin 655
Series Mediatek MT8
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 « 2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87681.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81682 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2350 MHz2000 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 48 / 8
Technology16 nm12 nm16 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 DecodeARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)PowerVR GE8300ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13510 Points (11%)
13779 Points (12%)
min: 13535     avg: 13553     median: 13535 (11%)     max: 13590 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1608 Points (19%)
853 Points (10%)
1438 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1554 Points (18%)
860 Points (10%)
1391 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
133 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
455 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
913 Points (9%)
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3460 Points (4%)
2217 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (12%)
741 Points (10%)
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784 (11%)     max: 788 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3348 Points (8%)
2043 Points (5%)
min: 3240     avg: 3291     median: 3290.5 (8%)     max: 3341 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
8591 ms (10%)
11505 ms (13%)
min: 8768     avg: 9071     median: 9070.5 (11%)     max: 9373 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1609 ms (18%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
4589 Points (4%)
3920 Points (4%)
min: 4199     avg: 4415     median: 4414.5 (4%)     max: 4630 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
60438 Points (21%)
min: 56764     avg: 56781     median: 56781 (19%)     max: 56798 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
15424 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24878 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
4722 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
30304 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
75328 Points (7%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
162396 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4464 Points (29%)
4808 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
5794 Points (29%)
6431 Points (32%)
min: 4383     avg: 4401     median: 4401 (22%)     max: 4419 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2761 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6844 Points (15%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 658 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 81% n=8

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 655 → 92% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 23:42:51

#0 checking url part for id 8960 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8478 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.103s ... 0.104s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.104s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8960 +0.004s ... 0.108s

#8 got single benchmarks 8960 +0.007s ... 0.115s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.012s ... 0.127s

#10 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.009s ... 0.136s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8478 +0.003s ... 0.139s

#12 got single benchmarks 8478 +0.01s ... 0.149s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.149s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.175s ... 0.324s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.324s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)