ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:8800

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs vs Vivante GC800
Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs vs Vivante GC800

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

Two Nvidia GeForce 8800M GTX cards are combined in SLI. With this setup, users should be able to play DirectX 10 PC games on high detail settings and resolutions. Nonetheless, not every game supports SLI efficiently. As a result, only an increase of 0-40% is obtainable over a single 8800M GTX, depending on the application and driver support. Overall performance should still be similar to a 9800M GT SLI combination.

A particular feature of the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is Unified Shaders. Dedicated pixel and vertex shaders have been replaced with 2x96 Stream Processors, which have now taken over much of the graphics rendering work. The Shader units are also clocked higher than the core chip itself (1250 MHz versus 800 MHz).

The performance of an 8800M GTX in SLI is much better than an 8700M GT in SLI and even the GeForce 7950 GTX in SLI.

The current consumption (about 2x35 Watt TDP) and created heat of dual 8800M GTX cards are much higher compared to the 8700M GT in SLI. This reserves the 8800M GTX SLI setup for larger laptops with more powerful (and possibly louder) cooling solutions.

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC800 is an integrated graphics card for ARM based (e.g. Rockchip RK291x) and MIPS based (e.g. Actions ATM701x) SoCs. It offers a single VEC-4 (or in other words four VEC-1) unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) and OpenCL 1.2 (optional). The clock rate can be choosen between 315 and 575 MHz in 40nm designs and up to 800 MHz in 28nm designs.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLIVivante GC800
Series
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI 192 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 8800M GTX 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 8800M GTS 64 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameNB8E-GTX
ArchitectureG9x
Pipelines192 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0OpenGL ES 2.0
Power Consumption130 Watt
Transistors1.5 Billion
technology65 nm28 nm
Features1250 MHz Shader frequence, probably: PureVideo Technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 Decoder acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 energy  management (dynamic switching between performance and energy saving), HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting), designed for Windows Vista, Dual-Link DVI-D exits for resolutions of TFT up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement19.11.2007 01.01.2012
Information2 graphic cards combined by SLI
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
6326 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
5995 Points (3%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 30794     avg: 33318     median: 33221 (35%)     max: 35940 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 45520     avg: 46802     median: 47241 (25%)     max: 47645 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 15615     avg: 16942     median: 16365 (18%)     max: 18845 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
3DMark 06
13500 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
3DMark 06
min: 10824     avg: 11745     median: 11565 (15%)     max: 12847 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.8 Points (85%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4653     avg: 4925     median: 4925 (3%)     max: 5197 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
95.6 113.2 ~ 104 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
58.7 68.7 ~ 64 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
36.5 46.9 55.1 ~ 46 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
114.7 134.7 ~ 125 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
49 58.1 ~ 54 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
34.8 37.7 45.5 ~ 39 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
56 72 ~ 64 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
33 44 ~ 39 fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
40  fps
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
60  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
117 586 ~ 352 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
84 332 ~ 208 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
76 201 ~ 139 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
125.2 141 160.6 ~ 142 fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
125.1 139.3 161.8 ~ 142 fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
121.5 137.8 160.1 ~ 140 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI:
116.3 136.9 161.1 ~ 138 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark1046446
Crysis - CPU Benchmark1255439
World in Conflict - Benchmark6439
Call of Juarez Benchmark40
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion60
F.E.A.R.352208139
Doom 3142142140138
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
3

1
2
2

4
1
2



1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 26. 20:45:54

#0 checking url part for id 514 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8800 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.109s ... 0.11s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.11s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.11s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 514 +0.035s ... 0.145s

#9 got single benchmarks 514 +0.014s ... 0.16s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8800 +0.002s ... 0.161s

#11 got single benchmarks 8800 +0s ... 0.162s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0.002s ... 0.163s

#13 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.009s ... 0.172s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.172s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.114s ... 0.286s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.286s

#17 Got 38 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.29s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.29s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.293s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.017s ... 0.309s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.309s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.311s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)