Notebookcheck Logo
Honor Win review

Gaming monster with active fan and 10,000 mAh battery – Honor Win smartphone review

Sustained performance thanks to the fan.

Smartphones with active cooling are very rare; with the Honor Win, the Chinese manufacturer is making a new attempt. And it could succeed: The phone remains compact and still offers a powerful battery, super-fast charging and many other gaming features.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Ninh Duy (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Gaming Smartphone

Verdict on the Honor Win

The small fan, elegantly concealed within the camera module, effectively extends the sustained performance of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the Honor Win and limits throttling. However, the clearly audible fan must be tolerated, although it can be completely disabled if required.

Otherwise, the Honor Win offers all the features expected from a true premium-class phone: a very bright display, a good camera system, and a large 10,000 mAh battery that enables long runtimes and also recharges relatively quickly.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

The phone is currently only available as an import from China. European languages are included in the software, but there is no Widevine certification, meaning some streaming content can only be viewed in low resolution. eSIM support is also absent, and there is no periscope zoom camera.

Nevertheless, the Honor Win is an interesting smartphone, especially for gamers who are not bothered by the fan noise during gaming.

Pros

+ effective active cooling
+ very long runtime
+ relatively fast charging
+ bright OLED display
+ sturdy metal casing
+ fast and stable WiFi
+ plenty of memory and RAM on request
+ accurate fingerprint sensor
+ physical camera button
+ good 50 MP main camera
+ many Bluetooth audio codecs
+ hardly any software restrictions despite import

Cons

- Fan clearly audible
- no Widevine L1
- no eSIM support
- no periscope zoom
- only available as a China import
- PWM flickering
- no sustainability information

Price and availability

Test device provided by Trading Shenzhen.
Test device provided by Trading Shenzhen.

The Honor Win is currently only available in Europe as a direct import.

Our loaner unit was provided by TradingShenzhen, which charges €737 (approx. $875), including shipping from its EU warehouse.

Translator's note: Honor smartphones are generally not officially sold in North America (U.S. and Canada).

Specifications

Honor Win
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.83 inch 13:9, 2800 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 185 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 487 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: compass, hall, acceleration, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 5G: n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n13 / n18 / n20 / n25 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n70 / n77 / n78 / n79 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89: 4G:FDD-LTE:B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B13 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28 / B66; TDD-LTE:B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G:B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G:B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 163.1 x 76.6 ( = 0.33 x 6.42 x 3.02 in)
Battery
10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100 Watt wired charging, 80 Watt wireless charging, 27 Watt wired reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.95, OIS (camera 1), 50 MP, f/2.4, tele, OIS, 3x zoom (camera 2), 12 MP, f/2.2, ultrawide (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers with AI subwoofer, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 12 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69/IP69K certified; , waterproof
Weight
229 g ( = 8.08 oz / 0.5 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
737 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and features - Gaming phone with a minimalist look

The gaming phone’s design is understated: a white matte glass back and a large camera module spanning the entire width, reminiscent of the iPhone 17 Pro.

The metal frame makes the chassis feel very rigid and it could not be twisted in our test. IP68/69K protection even allows submersion in water.

A physical camera button is located on the right side of the chassis.

The USB port supports fast data transfer and also provides DisplayPort output. The phone includes 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB of internal storage; microSD expansion is not supported. A configuration with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage is also available.

Honor Win review
Honor Win review
Honor Win review
Honor Win review
Honor Win review

Size comparison

163.7 mm / 6.44 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 215 g0.474 lbs163.1 mm / 6.42 in 76.6 mm / 3.02 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 229 g0.505 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 224 g0.4938 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 219 g0.4828 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation - Wi-Fi 7 performance

Wi-Fi 7 is supported as the fastest wireless standard, but we were only able to test Wi-Fi 6E using our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000. In this setup, the phone achieves very stable and fast transfer rates of up to 1,756 Mbit/s.

All major 4G and 5G frequency bands are supported, allowing the phone to be used worldwide.

The fingerprint reader is integrated beneath the display panel, works very reliably, and unlocks the phone instantly once a fingerprint is recognized. Facial recognition is also available, but it relies only on the front camera in 2D and is therefore somewhat less secure.

Networking
Honor Win
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
945 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1756 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo iQOO 15
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
810 (min: 606) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1254 (min: 860) MBit/s ∼71%
Honor Magic8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼45%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
959 (min: 636) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1595 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
922 (min: 721) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1697 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼97%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1042 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1256 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1452 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
692 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
717 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1281 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1373 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Honor Win; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø945 (713-1091)
Honor Win; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1756 (1647-1812)

Software and sustainability - Unfortunately no Widevine

The Chinese version of MagicOS 10 is preinstalled on our smartphone. The main difference compared to the international version is that Google apps must first be installed manually if needed.

Otherwise, most European languages are available without issues, and even Android Auto and Google Pay work. However, there is no Widevine L1 certification, meaning streaming content from many providers is limited to a maximum of 480p.

Honor provides no information regarding sustainability, although plastic film is used in the packaging. The update policy is expected to include four major software updates.

Cameras - No periscope, but still good photos

Front camera sample
Front camera sample

The 50-megapixel main camera is located on the rear and is supported by a telephoto camera that enables 3× hybrid zoom using different focal lengths. However, there is no optical periscope zoom.

Photos from the main camera show vivid colors and appear sharp, though sometimes over-sharpened. Images remain sharp in low light, but dynamic range in darker areas could be stronger.

The 12-megapixel ultra-wide camera takes acceptable panoramic photos, but fine details are barely recognizable when enlarged.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Win: 7.1 ∆E min: 3.08 - max: 11.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Win: 15.04 ∆E min: 5.06 - max: 20.83 ∆E

Display - Honor Win with a fast gamer display

The 6.8-inch screen has a resolution of 2,800 × 1,272 pixels. The OLED panel therefore achieves a good pixel density, although other phones such as the Vivo iQOO 15 offer slightly higher resolution. The screen is not quite as bright as the competition in HDR mode or in small bright areas, but it remains easily usable outdoors and also provides very accurate color reproduction.

We detected PWM flickering at 120 Hz, and the manufacturer also states that the frequency can be increased to over 5,000 Hz. Nevertheless, sensitive users should test the display before purchasing.

1132
cd/m²
1145
cd/m²
1150
cd/m²
1166
cd/m²
1175
cd/m²
1142
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
1160
cd/m²
1129
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1175 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1150.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1175 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.253
CCT: 6649 K
Honor Win
OLED, 2800x1272, 6.8"
Vivo iQOO 15
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.9"
Honor Magic8 Pro
OLED, 2808x1256, 6.7"
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Screen
-14%
16%
8%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1175
1137
-3%
1809
54%
1303
11%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1150
1113
-3%
1821
58%
1300
13%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
96
0%
95
-1%
98
2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.52
-52%
1.2
-20%
1.12
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
3.05
-13%
2.9
-7%
2.25
17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.3
-10%
1.8
14%
1.7
19%
Gamma
2.253 98%
2.265 97%
2.22 99%
2.242 98%
CCT
6649 98%
6560 99%
6446 101%
6404 101%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3528 cd/m² +148%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3233 cd/m² +128%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2885 cd/m² +103%
Honor Win
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1421 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6045 cd/m² +142%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3648 cd/m² +46%
Honor Win
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2498 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 18 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8016 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space
CalMAN color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

Performance, emissions and battery life - Sustained performance thanks to the fan

The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is currently one of the most powerful smartphone SoCs, and the Honor Win correspondingly ranks near the top in benchmarks. To maintain performance for longer, Honor installs a small fan that activates when needed but can also be enabled manually. It does not increase peak performance, but keeps performance stable for longer.

In gaming, frame rates of up to 120 fps are possible on low settings, although we could not reach the display’s maximum 185 Hz because hardly any games support it. Frame rates remain very stable, and we observed no stuttering even at high settings.

The fan can automatically switch off when the speakers are in use and is not particularly loud overall, reaching a maximum of about 40 dB(A) at a distance of 15 cm. The speakers can become quite loud, but at maximum volume they sound somewhat treble-heavy. Many Bluetooth audio codecs are supported.

The Honor Win features a very large 10,000 mAh battery: the phone lasted 32:36 hours in our Wi-Fi test, making three days of use without charging realistic. If recharging is required, wired charging supports up to 100 W and takes just over two hours. Wireless charging of up to 80 W is also supported.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3722 Points +1%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3718 Points +1%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3683 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=11)
3670 Points 0%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3613 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=208, last 2 years)
1732 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11411 Points +3%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11301 Points +2%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11178 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=11)
11176 Points 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11125 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=208, last 2 years)
5098 Points -54%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
30187 Points +1%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
30166 Points +1%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
29985 Points
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
28056 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (23088 - 30621, n=10)
27983 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30621, n=190, last 2 years)
11202 Points -63%
Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
8072 Points 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8052 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6289 - 8329, n=11)
7312 Points -9%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7255 Points -10%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
7098 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8140, n=192, last 2 years)
2948 Points -63%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
8102 Points 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8099 Points
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7321 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6168 - 8102, n=10)
7189 Points -11%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
7087 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8102, n=191, last 2 years)
2931 Points -64%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps 0%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=10)
106.7 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=205, last 2 years)
59.2 fps -51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
361 fps +14%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
334 fps +5%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
322 fps +1%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
318 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (203 - 361, n=11)
298 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 367, n=205, last 2 years)
117.2 fps -63%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
105 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=10)
104.5 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=206, last 2 years)
47.5 fps -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
129 fps +2%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
127 fps +1%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
126 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
119 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (65 - 145, n=11)
113.8 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 146, n=205, last 2 years)
45.1 fps -64%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
58 fps +4%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
56 fps 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
56 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
55 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (35 - 58, n=10)
50 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=206, last 2 years)
20.9 fps -63%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
843 Points +6%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
792 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
768 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=75, last 2 years)
709 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (511 - 843, n=10)
654 Points -17%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
511 Points -35%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=75, last 2 years)
2824 Points +275%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
843 Points +12%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
757 Points 0%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
754 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 843, n=10)
631 Points -16%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
505 Points -33%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=75, last 2 years)
4173 Points +122%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1986 Points +6%
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1879 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1769 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1986, n=10)
1403 Points -25%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1132 Points -40%
CrossMark
Overall
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2856 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2722 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2856, n=8)
2379 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2856, n=114, last 2 years)
1162 Points -59%
Productivity
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2366 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2317 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1380 - 2366, n=8)
1978 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (198 - 2366, n=114, last 2 years)
1081 Points -54%
Creativity
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2123 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1992 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1357 - 2123, n=8)
1779 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (163 - 2123, n=114, last 2 years)
978 Points -54%
Responsiveness
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12246 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11256 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6210 - 12907, n=8)
10117 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (239 - 13042, n=114, last 2 years)
3073 Points -75%
Honor WinVivo iQOO 15Honor Magic8 ProXiaomi 17 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
19%
22%
2%
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
2856.3
2556.87
-10%
3942.69
38%
3987.92
40%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
2745.2
2589.26
-6%
3732.81
36%
3974.23
45%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
471.2
453.54
-4%
488.67
4%
547.56
16%
396 ?(279 - 576, n=28)
-16%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
594.7
689.01
16%
587.11
-1%
524.05
-12%
Max. Load
 48.1 °C
119 F
48.5 °C
119 F
45 °C
113 F
 
 48.4 °C
119 F
48.5 °C
119 F
47 °C
117 F
 
 49.3 °C
121 F
49.5 °C
121 F
45.4 °C
114 F
 
Maximum: 49.5 °C = 121 F
Average: 47.7 °C = 118 F
42.2 °C
108 F
46.2 °C
115 F
47.8 °C
118 F
41.7 °C
107 F
46.6 °C
116 F
47 °C
117 F
43.6 °C
110 F
46.6 °C
116 F
47.8 °C
118 F
Maximum: 47.8 °C = 118 F
Average: 45.5 °C = 114 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Win
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
72.6 %
Honor Win
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
54.6 % -25%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67.4 % -7%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.9 % -9%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 % -31%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Win
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
78 %
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
73 % -6%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.8 % -16%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50.7 % -35%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.5 %
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
51.6 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Win
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
89.7 %
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
72.6 % -19%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
48.4 % -46%
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Honor Win; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø25.9 (22-28.3)
Honor Win; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; with activated fan: Ø104.8 (100-137.8)
Honor Win; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø98.5 (77.8-142.4)
Honor Win; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø13.2 (11.9-13.3)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs206.925.52511.730.93116.530.64021.732.45025.636.66324.140.6802327.110023.139.312524.847.916025.352.720025.355.625023.357.731524.852.440019.261.650014.763.963014.872.18009.272.110007.377.412507.578.616008.779.820005.777.125001276.6315013.473.240009.971.7500013.177.563009.281.180008.674100001069.5125005.952.3160005.639.9SPL25.588.5N0.751.7median 12median 71.7Delta6.511.416.947.517.839.220.732.532.933.43634.931.626.234.728.433.143.129.252.82655.62456.823.255.821.356.620.661.114.363.215.470.211.368.98.170.76.176.32.875.24.274.44.9698.666.713.766.56.170.13.677.22.575.52.568.53.568.54.259.826.784.70.661.1median 8.6median 68.58.86.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor WinXiaomi 17 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Win audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 17 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
65h 26min
WiFi Websurfing
32h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
8h 22min
Honor Win
10000 mAh
Vivo iQOO 15
7000 mAh
Honor Magic8 Pro
6270 mAh
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
6800 mAh
Battery runtime
-27%
-17%
-22%
Reader / Idle (h)
65.4
52.1
-20%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
32.6
23.7
-27%
26.9
-17%
25.9
-21%
Load (h)
8.4
6.2
-26%
H.264 (h)
35.2

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Honor Win is an extremely fast gaming phone with active cooling and a very large battery.

Even as an import, it has only a few usage limitations.

In the test: Honor Win. Test device provided by Trading Shenzhen.
In the test: Honor Win. Test device provided by Trading Shenzhen.

Honor Win - 02/13/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
60 / 69 → 87%
Weight
88%
Battery
97%
Display
92%
Games Performance
42 / 55 → 77%
Application Performance
96 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
49%
Temperature
82%
Noise
80%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
83%
Average
59%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
10%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 20.2%

Possible alternatives in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.6%
Honor Win
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Charlotte's Web
2. 
Screen Protector for Honor W...
3. 
Shantime [2 Pack Tempered Gl...
List Price: 737€
229 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2800x1272
450 PPI
OLED
2.
88.6%
Vivo iQOO 15
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote...
2. 
Ibywind for vivo iQOO 15 5G ...
3. 
for Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (6.85...
List Price: 580€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.85"
3168x1440
508 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.3%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
UOGNADGD 6-Pack Tempered Gla...
2. 
Ibywind for Honor Magic8 Pro...
3. 
[5 Pack] Screen Protector fo...
List Price: 1300€
219 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.71"
2808x1256
458 PPI
OLED
4.
90.4%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Fhyeugfy for Xiaomi 17 Ultra...
2. 
Luchantle 2 Pack Camera Lens...
3. 
Anbzsign 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi...
List Price: 950€
224 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Gaming monster with active fan and 10,000 mAh battery – Honor Win smartphone review
Florian Schmitt, 2026-02-18 (Update: 2026-02-18)