Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2019. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 855 is the switch from Cortex-A76 to the faster Cortex-A77 architecture. The clock speeds stay the same. 

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865 can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is now called Adreno 650 and should offer 20% more performance than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855.

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers an improved KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is now also significantly faster. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller now supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 865 is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
CodenameExynos M3 / Cortex-A55Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Samsung Exynos 9825 compare1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9820 compare1.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 « - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G compare2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) compare2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 « 2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Clock <=2900 MHz2420 - 2840 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerAdreno 650 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP18Qualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 587 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturernews.samsung.com
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
TDP5 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865
min: 1.186     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (91%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18756     avg: 23944     median: 26226 (22%)     max: 26851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2546     avg: 2717     median: 2601.5 (24%)     max: 3120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2561     avg: 2752     median: 2649.5 (30%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
679 Points (3%)
932 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2033 Points (6%)
3450 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3688     avg: 3721     median: 3698 (37%)     max: 3776 Points
min: 4261     avg: 4281     median: 4278 (43%)     max: 4304 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8786     avg: 8874     median: 8874 (9%)     max: 8963 Points
min: 13186     avg: 13396     median: 13356 (13%)     max: 13589 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3786 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8491 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (9%)     max: 5935 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (29%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
min: 3576     avg: 3816     median: 3918 (32%)     max: 3954 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1898     avg: 2002     median: 2001.5 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
min: 4592     avg: 4779     median: 4742 (43%)     max: 5003 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (20%)     max: 10443 Points
min: 17346     avg: 18106     median: 18163 (36%)     max: 18810 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (11%)     max: 5661 Points
min: 8818     avg: 9056     median: 9174 (18%)     max: 9175 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6025     avg: 6099     median: 6098.5 (16%)     max: 6172 Points
min: 10610     avg: 10878     median: 10921 (29%)     max: 11104 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2060     avg: 2509     median: 2394 (3%)     max: 3189 ms
min: 0     avg: 2031     median: 2032.5 (2%)     max: 2911 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 865 +
312.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12933     avg: 14397     median: 14711.5 (11%)     max: 15233 Points
min: 14606     avg: 22518     median: 23734 (18%)     max: 31224 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 63     avg: 67.8     median: 68 (12%)     max: 72 Points
min: 97     avg: 106.7     median: 104 (19%)     max: 127 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 7800     avg: 8235     median: 8294 (25%)     max: 8612 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 53528     avg: 55588     median: 55698 (68%)     max: 57538 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 91292     avg: 92956     median: 92887 (29%)     max: 94690 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 80534     avg: 86884     median: 88577 (54%)     max: 91540 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 236552     avg: 243663     median: 243861 (43%)     max: 250577 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
58288 Points (49%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
51005 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
117851 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
102716 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
329860 Points (32%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 628715     avg: 671674     median: 671674 (33%)     max: 714632 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 171838     avg: 178785     median: 178785 (45%)     max: 185732 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (13%)     max: 2429 Points
min: 6478     avg: 8077     median: 6893 (36%)     max: 11637 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 5088     avg: 5342     median: 5341.5 (11%)     max: 5595 Points
min: 21645     avg: 24717     median: 24097 (51%)     max: 28841 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5184     avg: 5411     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5851 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5736     avg: 6022     median: 5891 (29%)     max: 6571 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 865 +
11610 Points (43%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 865 +
4.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 865 +
2.3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 → 188% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 18:00:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11551 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753718419s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 9632 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11551 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 11551 +0.017s ... 0.034s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.043s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.061s

#14 return log +0s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)