Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7420

The Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa (also called Exynos 7 Octa) is a high-end system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in March 2015 alongside the Samsung Galaxy S6 and features four Cortex-A57 cores clocked at up to 2.1 GHz. Furthermore, there are four additional Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.5 GHz, an ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU and a 2x 32 bit LPDDR4-3104 memory controller (up to 24.8 GB/s). It is one of the first fully 64-bit capable ARM SoCs for Android devices.

Processor

Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A53 represent the successors of the Cortex-A15 and Cortex-A7 architecture. In addition to some small tweaks leading to a somewhat higher performance per clock, both Cortex-A57 and -A53 are now 64-bit capable ARMv8 designs (Cortex-A15 and -A7: 32 bit ARMv7). Thanks to its advanced 14 nm process, clocks and performance of the Exynos 7420 are quite stable even in long-lasting benchmarks. Overall, the cpu performance is above the Nvidia Tegra K1 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 810

While the powerful Cortex-A57 cores will handle complex software and games, the SoC can switch to the more efficient Cortex-A53 cluster in less demanding applications. If necessary, it's possible to activate individual cores from each cluster or even all eight cores at the same time. This concept developed by ARM is known as "big.LITTLE" and intended to improve the battery life.

Graphics

The Exynos 7420 integrates a Mali-T760 MP8 GPU, which offers eight shader clusters clocked at up to 772 MHz (302 GFLOPS). The Mali-T760 supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1 and DirectX 11 and offers a performance above the Adreno 430 (Snapdragon 810) or PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). Thus, the GPU is one of the high-end solutions as of 2015 and can handle even the most demanding Android games in high resolutions (Galaxy S6: 2560 x 1440 pixels) and detail settings.

Power Consumption

The Exynos 7 Octa is the first smartphone SoC to be manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs (Samsung LPE). Therefore, the Exynos 7420 is one of the most energy efficient chips in early 2015 and runs much cooler than the competing Qualcomm Snapdragon 810.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

ModelSamsung Exynos 7420 OctaQualcomm Snapdragon 660
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A57/-A53Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A57/-A53
Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa compare1.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A57/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock2100 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU (773 MHz), 4x Cortex-A57 (2.1 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory ControllerAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISP
iGPUARM Mali-T760 MP8 (700 - 772 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 16117     avg: 17761     median: 17400 (15%)     max: 19260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2238     avg: 2695     median: 2752 (31%)     max: 2815 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1431     avg: 1598     median: 1617 (16%)     max: 1646 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 4895     avg: 5694     median: 5850 (6%)     max: 5913 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1309 Points (18%)
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4058 Points (10%)
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4843     avg: 4958     median: 4958 (9%)     max: 5073 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1146     avg: 1238     median: 1237.5 (24%)     max: 1329 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4207     avg: 4933     median: 4953 (8%)     max: 5619 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1202     avg: 1386     median: 1410 (21%)     max: 1520 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2410 Points (19%)
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3734 Points (34%)
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10547 Points (21%)
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4350 Points (9%)
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6201 Points (16%)
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
839 MFLOPS (28%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
626 MFLOPS (61%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4037     avg: 4731     median: 5067 (6%)     max: 5089 ms
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 347.1     avg: 518     median: 546 (6%)     max: 689 ms
630 ms (7%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 564     avg: 633     median: 632.5 (6%)     max: 701 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7534     avg: 8336     median: 8518 (8%)     max: 9253 Points
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 2583     avg: 2627     median: 2613 (70%)     max: 2686 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 2951     avg: 3162     median: 3109 (69%)     max: 3425 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 4666     avg: 4957     median: 4742 (63%)     max: 5463 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 33360     avg: 34836     median: 34729 (80%)     max: 36419 points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 56852     avg: 65987     median: 68265.5 (69%)     max: 72094 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
77963 Points (27%)
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6301     avg: 7335     median: 7220.5 (22%)     max: 8424 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33509     avg: 37799     median: 38669.5 (47%)     max: 39182 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 21675     avg: 28666     median: 30372.5 (9%)     max: 30829 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 48764     avg: 63355     median: 64877.5 (40%)     max: 66862 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
2156 Iter./s (66%)
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
23154 Iter./s (76%)
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 162584     avg: 169599     median: 169794 (22%)     max: 176225 Points
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5050     avg: 5098     median: 5113 (26%)     max: 5130 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
6514 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5789     avg: 6050     median: 6052 (40%)     max: 6426 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 113% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 07. 15:11:20

#0 checking url part for id 6662 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:41:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6662 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 6662 +0.014s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.017s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.038s ... 0.103s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.198s ... 0.301s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.326s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)