Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Samsung Exynos 1380

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1380

The Samsung Exynos 1380 is a system on a chip (SoC) designed for mid-range smartphones and tablets running on the Android operating system. The CPU is made up of two clusters, each consisting of four cores. It features four Cortex-A78 performance cores (up to 2.4 GHz) and four Cortex-A55 power-saving cores (up to 2.0 GHz). The integrated graphics unit is an ARM Mali-G68 MP5 with speeds of up to 950 MHz.

The NPU's performance has been improved by around 14 percent compared to its predecessor, with a capacity of 4.9 TOPS. Displays with up to 144 Hz and Full HD+ resolution can now be used, and the chipset supports cameras with up to 200 MPix. The chipset also includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. Both LPDDR4x and LPDDR5 can be used as RAM, and UFS 3.1 is possible as internal storage.

The integrated modem has significantly increased download speeds, supporting both 5G-Sub6 (download: up to 3.79 Gbps (+32%), upload: up to 1.28 Gbps) and 5G-mmWave (download: up to 3.67 Gbps (+75%), upload: up to 0.92 Gbps). The upload speed for LTE (Cat. 18, download: up to 1.2 Gbps, upload: up to 0.211 Gbps (+5%)) has only been slightly improved.

The Exynos 1380 is manufactured by Samsung using the 5-nm process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2019. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 855 is the switch from Cortex-A76 to the faster Cortex-A77 architecture. The clock speeds stay the same. 

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865 can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is now called Adreno 650 and should offer 20% more performance than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855.

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers an improved KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is now also significantly faster. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller now supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 865 is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

ModelSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
CodenameARM Cortex-A55 / A78Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Samsung Exynos 1480 compare2.05 - 2.75 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 1380 « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 1330 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G compare2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) compare2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 « 2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz2420 - 2840 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8 / 8
Technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesNPU, Wi-Fi 802.11ax (2x2 MIMO), Bluetooth 5.3, FM Radio Rx, GNSS (GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo), Triple-ISPAdreno 650 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP5 ( - 950 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 587 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.com
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
TDP5 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865
min: 1.186     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (91%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4227     avg: 4385     median: 4383 (41%)     max: 4486 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4176     avg: 4349     median: 4386.5 (50%)     max: 4445 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1008     avg: 1014     median: 1012 (25%)     max: 1023 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 2857     avg: 2877     median: 2866 (11%)     max: 2906 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1006 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
2828 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 771     avg: 781     median: 783 (31%)     max: 788 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2719     avg: 2761     median: 2763 (5%)     max: 2817 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
786 Points (3%)
932 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2766 Points (9%)
3450 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3550     avg: 3556     median: 3555.5 (35%)     max: 3561 Points
min: 4261     avg: 4281     median: 4278 (43%)     max: 4304 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11130     avg: 11160     median: 11160 (11%)     max: 11190 Points
min: 13186     avg: 13396     median: 13356 (13%)     max: 13589 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 3576     avg: 3816     median: 3918 (32%)     max: 3954 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 4592     avg: 4779     median: 4742 (43%)     max: 5003 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 17346     avg: 18106     median: 18163 (36%)     max: 18810 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 8818     avg: 9056     median: 9174 (18%)     max: 9175 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 10610     avg: 10878     median: 10921 (29%)     max: 11104 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 975.3     avg: 1128     median: 1139.1 (1%)     max: 1208.8 ms
min: 0     avg: 2031     median: 2032.5 (2%)     max: 2911 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
187 ms (2%)
312.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 33801     avg: 35734     median: 35384 (27%)     max: 38939 Points
min: 14606     avg: 22518     median: 23734 (18%)     max: 31224 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 97     avg: 110.7     median: 110.5 (30%)     max: 123 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 131.3     median: 125 (22%)     max: 145 Points
min: 97     avg: 106.7     median: 104 (19%)     max: 127 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 505141     avg: 510383     median: 508957 (25%)     max: 518476 Points
min: 628715     avg: 671674     median: 671674 (33%)     max: 714632 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 151517     avg: 153827     median: 154008 (38%)     max: 155773 Points
min: 171838     avg: 178785     median: 178785 (45%)     max: 185732 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 434759     avg: 558136     median: 583142 (19%)     max: 602612 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 149287     avg: 186409     median: 195056 (6%)     max: 200922 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
591842 Points (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 33.8     avg: 38.4     median: 37.3 (25%)     max: 45.2 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 121     avg: 308.5     median: 334.5 (9%)     max: 444 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 32.3     avg: 35.3     median: 34.9 (17%)     max: 38.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 478     avg: 482.8     median: 484 (13%)     max: 485 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 12748     avg: 17192     median: 17384 (8%)     max: 20032 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11259     avg: 12707     median: 13214 (49%)     max: 13488 Points
11610 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 6478     avg: 8077     median: 6893 (36%)     max: 11637 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 21645     avg: 24717     median: 24097 (51%)     max: 28841 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.62     avg: 6.2     median: 6 (3%)     max: 7.1 Watt
135%
1 SD 865 +
4.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.7     median: 1.5 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt
63%
1 SD 865 +
2.3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1380 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 → 104% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 16. 13:03:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15010 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11551 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752663816s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15010 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 15010 +0.008s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11551 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 11551 +0.017s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.042s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.059s

#14 return log +0s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)