Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G

Samsung Exynos 1380

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1380

The Samsung Exynos 1380 is a system on a chip (SoC) designed for mid-range smartphones and tablets running on the Android operating system. The CPU is made up of two clusters, each consisting of four cores. It features four Cortex-A78 performance cores (up to 2.4 GHz) and four Cortex-A55 power-saving cores (up to 2.0 GHz). The integrated graphics unit is an ARM Mali-G68 MP5 with speeds of up to 950 MHz.

The NPU's performance has been improved by around 14 percent compared to its predecessor, with a capacity of 4.9 TOPS. Displays with up to 144 Hz and Full HD+ resolution can now be used, and the chipset supports cameras with up to 200 MPix. The chipset also includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. Both LPDDR4x and LPDDR5 can be used as RAM, and UFS 3.1 is possible as internal storage.

The integrated modem has significantly increased download speeds, supporting both 5G-Sub6 (download: up to 3.79 Gbps (+32%), upload: up to 1.28 Gbps) and 5G-mmWave (download: up to 3.67 Gbps (+75%), upload: up to 0.92 Gbps). The upload speed for LTE (Cat. 18, download: up to 1.2 Gbps, upload: up to 0.211 Gbps (+5%)) has only been slightly improved.

The Exynos 1380 is manufactured by Samsung using the 5-nm process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 778G 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (SDM778G 5G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster with four cores based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.4 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 778G is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642L offers a 40% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR5-3200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 778G is manufactured in the modern 6 nm process at TSMC (vs the 5LPE of the 780G).

ModelSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameARM Cortex-A55 / A78Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Samsung Exynos 1480 compare2.05 - 2.75 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 1380 « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G compare1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 compare1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G « 1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz1800 - 2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology5 nm6 nm
FeaturesNPU, Wi-Fi 802.11ax (2x2 MIMO), Bluetooth 5.3, FM Radio Rx, GNSS (GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo), Triple-ISPAdreno 642L GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Spectra 570L ISP, Wi-Fi 6E
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP5 ( - 950 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 642L
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 778G 5G
min: 1.035     avg: 1     median: 1 (80%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22441     avg: 30385     median: 30384.5 (26%)     max: 38328 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4227     avg: 4364     median: 4375 (52%)     max: 4460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4176     avg: 4349     median: 4386.5 (50%)     max: 4445 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1011     avg: 1016     median: 1014.5 (27%)     max: 1023 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2882     median: 2882.5 (11%)     max: 2906 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 771     avg: 781     median: 783 (33%)     max: 788 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2719     avg: 2761     median: 2763 (5%)     max: 2817 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
786 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2766 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3550     avg: 3556     median: 3555.5 (36%)     max: 3561 Points
min: 3452     avg: 3486     median: 3500 (35%)     max: 3505 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11130     avg: 11160     median: 11160 (12%)     max: 11190 Points
min: 10974     avg: 11228     median: 11003 (12%)     max: 11708 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1159     median: 1172.3 (1%)     max: 1208.8 ms
min: 1323     avg: 1620     median: 1708.8 (2%)     max: 1893 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
187 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 33801     avg: 35093     median: 34758 (31%)     max: 36155 Points
min: 23915     avg: 27285     median: 25445 (23%)     max: 31915 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 97     avg: 109.6     median: 108 (31%)     max: 123 Points
min: 64     avg: 71.3     median: 73.5 (21%)     max: 74 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 131.3     median: 125 (26%)     max: 145 Points
min: 93     avg: 107     median: 105.5 (22%)     max: 131 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 72277     avg: 76124     median: 73811 (62%)     max: 83387 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 76203     avg: 81700     median: 82261 (66%)     max: 89525 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 114681     avg: 127474     median: 116173 (21%)     max: 145964 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 136885     avg: 150928     median: 153671 (56%)     max: 158840 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 422597     avg: 436226     median: 435272 (42%)     max: 452805 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 505141     avg: 510383     median: 508957 (31%)     max: 518476 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 151517     avg: 153827     median: 154008 (42%)     max: 155773 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
591842 Points (78%)
min: 4322     avg: 4439     median: 4438.5 (1%)     max: 4555 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 33.8     avg: 36.1     median: 34.9 (26%)     max: 39.6 MB/s
42.9 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 121     avg: 264.3     median: 228 (7%)     max: 444 MB/s
411.5 MB/s (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 32.3     avg: 34     median: 32.6 (40%)     max: 37.2 MB/s
28.8 MB/s (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 478     avg: 482     median: 484 (13%)     max: 484 MB/s
826 MB/s (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 12748     avg: 16900     median: 17384 (28%)     max: 20032 Points
min: 14645     avg: 20211     median: 22224 (35%)     max: 23765 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11259     avg: 12568     median: 13024 (60%)     max: 13488 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8000 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
16076 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8501     avg: 10073     median: 10073 (66%)     max: 11645 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10619 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 637     avg: 665     median: 665 (25%)     max: 703 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.62     avg: 6.2     median: 5.9 (3%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.7     median: 1.5 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1380 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G → 101% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 15. 22:08:55

#0 checking url part for id 15010 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13821 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15010 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#7 got single benchmarks 15010 +0.014s ... 0.036s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13821 +0.015s ... 0.052s

#9 got single benchmarks 13821 +0.032s ... 0.084s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.172s ... 0.256s

#12 return log +0.059s ... 0.315s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)