Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology6 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 88482     avg: 89308     median: 89307.5 (10%)     max: 90133 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (27%)     max: 5763 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (17%)     max: 6240 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (4%)     max: 37 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (5%)     max: 89 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 132     avg: 134.9     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (20%)     max: 175807 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (0%)     max: 54.4 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (31%)     max: 38436 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (70%)     max: 43000 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
59 59 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
51 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
61  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift61
Armajet89
PUBG Mobile584038
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


2
3

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 12:49:33

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.014s ... 0.059s

#7 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.05s ... 0.11s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.291s ... 0.401s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.401s

#11 Got 48 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.413s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.413s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.417s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.105s ... 0.522s

#15 return log +0.071s ... 0.593s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 642L graphics card

Huawei Nova 11 Pro

Huawei Nova 11 Pro Smartphone Review: Neat phone that charges as fast as an arrow

Huawei has a high-end premium phone on offer with the Nova 11 Pro that wants to convince with super-fast charging, optical zoom, and an extraordinary look. The ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.78" | 188 g
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro smartphone review

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro review - Light 5G smartphone with 108 MP and 120-Hz Flow AMOLED (Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition)

Poco advertises nothing less than that as far as it concerns the X5 Pro. With a powerful Snapdragon chipset, flexible AMOLED display, and 108-MP camera, all the...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.67" | 181 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro review: Weatherproof tablet with replaceable battery

For those wanting to work with their tablet in bad weather, Samsung has the Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro on offer. It comes with lots of unusual features, such as a r...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 10.10" | 674 g
Huawei Nova 10 Pro review - High-end smartphone with 60 MP selfie camera

Huawei Nova 10 Pro review - High-end smartphone with 60 MP selfie camera

The Huawei Nova 10 Pro has many features that characterize a good upper-class smartphone. An appealing camera setup, plenty of storage, fast 100-watt charging, ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.78" | 191 g
Honor 70

Honor 70 review - The slim phone saves on the SoC

The Honor 70 attracts attention with its unusual look. In our test, the extravagant phone convinces, but also shows some savings measures that could become a pr...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.67" | 178 g

Xiaomi 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G Smartphone in review - the camera makes all the difference

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro review: Lightweight outdoor smartphone with power

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Review: Nothing Phone (1) – transparent designer piece at mid-range price

Motorola Edge 30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Edge 30 smartphone review: Featherweight with 144 Hz display

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy M52 5G review - A powerful 120-Hz smartphone that is destined to fail?

Huawei Nova 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei nova 9 smartphone review: Without 5G but with some special camera features

Honor 50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 50 smartphone in review: Goes with Google without Huawei

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE smartphone review: The top seller gets fine-tuned

Motorola Edge 20: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Edge 20 smartphone review: Lightweight smartphone with fast display

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G smartphone review: With more power in its latest version

Realme GT Master Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme GT Master Edition Smartphone Review - Designer piece with 5G

Huawei Nova 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 12 Lite

Vivo S17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S17

Honor V Purse: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 7.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor V Purse

Vivo V29: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V29

OnePlus Nord CE3: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord CE3

Huawei Nova 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11

Oppo K11: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K11

Oppo Reno10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno10 Pro

Huawei Nova 11 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11 Pro

Huawei Nova 11 Ultra: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro

Honor 80: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 80

Oppo Reno9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno9

Huawei Pocket S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Pocket S

Huawei Mate 50E: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate 50E

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 10.10", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro

Huawei nova 10: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei nova 10

Huawei Nova 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 10 Pro

Honor 70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 70

Vivo T1 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T1 Pro

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 12 Lite

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nothing Phone (1)

Vivo iQOO Z6 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z6 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Civi 1S: unknown, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Civi 1S

Huawei P50E: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei P50E

Realme 9 5G SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9 5G SE

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

Motorola Edge 30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 30

Vivo T1: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T1

Honor 60: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 60

Honor 60 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 60 Pro

Oppo Reno7 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno7

Realme Q3s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q3s

Realme Q3t: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q3t

Oppo K9s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K9s

Xiaomi Civi: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Civi

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M52

Motorola Edge 5G UW: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 5G UW

Vivo iQOO Z5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z5

Huawei Nova 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 9

Huawei Nova 9 Pro: unknown, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 11 Lite NE 5G

Motorola Edge 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 2021

Honor 50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 50

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

Motorola Edge 20: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 20

Honor 50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 50 Pro

Realme GT Master Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Master Edition

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing Phone (2a) release date revealed as Carl Pei explains what makes the smartphone stand out from the crowd

   » Nothing Phone (1) now eligible for Nothing OS 2.0 update with various changes and UI improvements

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Poco F5 Pro unboxing video and Poco F5 live images surface ahead of May 9 launch

   » Poco F5 appears on Geekbench 6 with a Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ahead of launch

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing Phone (1): New Nothing OS 1.5.3 update brings battery life improvements and Nothing Ear (2) support

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Poco X5 Pro vs Poco X4 Pro: Xiaomi finally puts performance back on the table

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 10.10", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro: Boasting unusual strengths

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy 6 Pro: Lots of changes have been made, but nothing essential

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing Phone (1): Not quite the revolution that was expected

Motorola Edge 30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Edge 30: Extremely thin mid-range smartphone with stock Android 12

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: The Samsung smartphone often comes up short

Honor 50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei nova 9: The separation from Honor looks like this?

Huawei Nova 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
   » Huawei nova 9: The separation from Honor looks like this?

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Powerful but superfluous smartphone

Motorola Edge 20: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Edge 20: The very slim mid-range phone is impressive, but not completely

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A great upgrade, if only things with the power adapter were different...

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 725 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU
Adreno 710 *

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 643 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 640 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Qualcomm Adreno 642L GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-09-10)