Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-9010 vs Intel Celeron N3450 vs Intel Celeron J3355

AMD E2-9010

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9010

The AMD E2-9010 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in mid 2016. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.0-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9010 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Celeron J3355

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J3355

The Intel Celeron J3355 is a dual-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in late 2016. It runs at 2 - 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron J3355 is slightly better than the lower power Celeron N3350 and less depending on the cooling solution. This means the processor is only suited for light daily tasks (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The Celeron J3355 is specified at 10 Watt TDP and therefore 4 Watts higher than the slightly slower Celeron N3350.

ModelAMD E2-9010Intel Celeron N3450Intel Celeron J3355
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameStoney RidgeApollo LakeApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 « 2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J34551.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J33552 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N33501.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J34551.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N34501.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 « 2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N33501.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2200 MHz1100 - 2200 MHz2000 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 42 / 2
TDP10-15 Watt6 Watt10 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGAFCBGA1296FCBGA1296
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Intel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
106 Points (12%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
200 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
91 Points (1%)
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
90 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
53 Points (16%)
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (13%)     max: 48 Points
47.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1.1 Points (1%)
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.6 Points (16%)
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1871 Points (11%)
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3268 Points (2%)
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1142 s (13%)
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
37.1 s (7%)
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-9010 +
769 Points (1%)
1020 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
3541 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
1825 MIPS (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-9010 +
7.4 fps (3%)
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-9010 +
39.2 fps (9%)
58.2 fps (13%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.7 GB/s (2%)
1.2 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
5811 Seconds (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
27.9 s (6%)
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
61.5 s (3%)
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1296 s (6%)
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1241 Points (3%)
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
14788 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
14287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
12726 Points (11%)
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (14%)     max: 17223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
919 Points (2%)
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1268 Points (2%)
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
1234 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1610 Points (16%)
1399 Points (14%)
1532 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2402 Points (3%)
4001 Points (4%)
2742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1512 Points (21%)
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (19%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2307 Points (6%)
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2348 Points (4%)
3958 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1415 Points (28%)
1202 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2484 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1516 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3104 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2675 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3377 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2957 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3062 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3043 ms (4%)
3476 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
234.5 ms (3%)
258.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E2-9010 +
10419 Points (9%)
11297 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9010 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 131% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J3355 → 99% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 09:46:13

#0 checking url part for id 8183 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11501 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8183 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 8183 +0.011s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.003s ... 0.056s

#10 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.024s ... 0.08s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11501 +0.003s ... 0.083s

#12 got single benchmarks 11501 +0.007s ... 0.089s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.278s ... 0.367s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.367s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)