Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3450 vs Intel Celeron J3355

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Celeron J3355

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J3355

The Intel Celeron J3355 is a dual-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in late 2016. It runs at 2 - 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron J3355 is slightly better than the lower power Celeron N3350 and less depending on the cooling solution. This means the processor is only suited for light daily tasks (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The Celeron J3355 is specified at 10 Watt TDP and therefore 4 Watts higher than the slightly slower Celeron N3350.

ModelIntel Celeron N3450Intel Celeron J3355
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameApollo LakeApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J33552 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N34501.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 « 2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2200 MHz2000 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1296
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
106 Points (12%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
200 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
90 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (13%)     max: 48 Points
47.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1020 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
3541 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
1825 MIPS (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.2 fps (13%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.2 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
5811 Seconds (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
14788 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
14287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (14%)     max: 17223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
1234 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1399 Points (14%)
1532 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4001 Points (4%)
2742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (19%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3958 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1202 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3476 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
258.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11297 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J3355 → 82% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 23:21:55

#0 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11501 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.002s ... 0.021s

#7 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.021s ... 0.042s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11501 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 11501 +0.005s ... 0.05s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.123s ... 0.173s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.195s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)