Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E-450 vs Intel Core i3-2310M

AMD E-450

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

Intel Core i3-2310M

► remove from comparison Intel 2310M

The Intel Core i3-2310M is a dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i5, the i3 does not offer the Turbo Boost technique for the CPU part and is therefore clocked at 2.1 GHz (max).

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements are the new 256Bit AVX instructions, the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

Der i3-2310M offers an integrated graphics card ( Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2310M it is clocked from  650-1100MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture, the average performance of the Core i3-2310M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i3 without Turbo Boost. In synthetic benchmarks, the performance was about on par with the faster clocked Core i5-430M (2.3-2.5 GHz) and therefore adequate for most applications.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

ModelAMD E-450Intel Core i3-2310M
CodenameZacateSandy Bridge
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Core i3
Series: Core i3 Sandy Bridge
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 « 1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Core i3-2370M compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2350M compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2348M compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2330M compare2.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2328M compare2.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2312M compare2.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2310M « 2.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2308M compare2.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2377M compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2375M compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2367M compare1.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2365M compare1.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2357M compare1.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock1650 MHz2100 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP18 Watt35 Watt
Technology40 nm32 nm
Die Size75 mm2149 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallrPGA988B / BGA1023
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VHD Graphics 3000 (650-1100MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L3 Cache3 MB
Transistors624 Million
max. Temp.85 (PGA); 100(BGA) °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1100 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.33 Points
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (6%)     max: 1077 Points
min: 2704     avg: 2755     median: 2762 (17%)     max: 2773 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (1%)     max: 2082 Points
min: 5693     avg: 6167     median: 6190.5 (4%)     max: 6307 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (1%)     max: 2299 Points
min: 5730     avg: 7390     median: 7463 (5%)     max: 7597 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (1%)     max: 1180 Points
min: 3319     avg: 3429     median: 3433 (4%)     max: 3496 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 s
min: 752     avg: 808     median: 765 (9%)     max: 1084 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.6 s
min: 23.6     avg: 26     median: 25.8 (5%)     max: 33.63 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (1%)     max: 499 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (2%)     max: 1070 Points
min: 2019     avg: 2503     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2560 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.69 s
min: 18     avg: 18.5     median: 18.6 (4%)     max: 20.37 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 105     avg: 107.1     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 s
min: 41     avg: 42.2     median: 42 (2%)     max: 46.74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 s
min: 944     avg: 968     median: 967 (4%)     max: 1039 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-450 +
9480 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-450 +
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (7%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (1%)     max: 2123 Points
min: 5399     avg: 6637     median: 6672 (5%)     max: 7015 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (2%)     max: 721 Points
min: 1846     avg: 2613     median: 2706 (7%)     max: 2888 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-2310M → 280% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 18. 08:25:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2852 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1571 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766042719s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2852 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 2852 +0.01s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1571 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 1571 +0.03s ... 0.046s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.064s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)