Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3450 vs Intel Celeron N2830

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove from comparison Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N3450Intel Celeron N2830
CodenameApollo LakeBay Trail-M
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 « 2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2200 MHz2160 - 2410 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology14 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache112 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (12%)     max: 48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (7%)     max: 1241 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (2%)     max: 2356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2830 +
3340 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2830 +
1783 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1020 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.2 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.2 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (3%)     max: 1052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
14788 Points (12%)
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (9%)     max: 11180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
14287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (13%)     max: 17223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1399 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4001 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (16%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (5%)     max: 4085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3958 Points (7%)
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1202 Points (16%)
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (12%)     max: 928 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3476 ms (4%)
min: 4141     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (5%)     max: 6996 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
258.2 ms (3%)
min: 319     avg: 432.7     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11297 Points (8%)
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (5%)     max: 7397 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 65% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 04. 09:55:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5684 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759564540s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.009s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5684 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 5684 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.045s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)