Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J3355 vs Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Celeron N3450

Intel Celeron J3355

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J3355

The Intel Celeron J3355 is a dual-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in late 2016. It runs at 2 - 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron J3355 is slightly better than the lower power Celeron N3350 and less depending on the cooling solution. This means the processor is only suited for light daily tasks (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The Celeron J3355 is specified at 10 Watt TDP and therefore 4 Watts higher than the slightly slower Celeron N3350.

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelIntel Celeron J3355Intel Processor N100Intel Celeron N3450
CodenameApollo LakeAlder Lake-NApollo Lake
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Celeron J34551.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N34501.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 « 2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N33501.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Celeron J34551.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J33552 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N33501.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2500 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz1100 - 2200 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
TDP10 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1296BGA1264FCBGA1296
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 500 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$128 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
24.4 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (34%)     max: 61 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2449     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 747     avg: 885     median: 910.5 (38%)     max: 942 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
106 Points (12%)
327%
1 N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338     median: 347 (38%)     max: 358 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
200 Points (0%)
489%
1 N100 +
min: 590     avg: 934     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
90 Points (1%)
446%
N100 +
min: 246     avg: 384.6     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
47.6 Points (13%)
311%
N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 147.9 (41%)     max: 155 Points
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (12%)     max: 48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.99 Points
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (11%)     max: 24225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
1020 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
3541 MIPS (2%)
329%
1 N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11072     median: 11663.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
1825 MIPS (22%)
200%
1 N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3653.5 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (8%)     max: 34.7 fps
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (28%)     max: 173 fps
58.2 fps (13%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
423%
1 N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
1.2 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2545     median: 2067 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
5811 Seconds (41%)
485%
1 N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1322     median: 1198.5 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
1566 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (9%)     max: 15625 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5317     median: 5940 (15%)     max: 6486 Points
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
14788 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
14287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52331     median: 52418.5 (43%)     max: 53373 Points
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (13%)     max: 17223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3959     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1234 Points (2%)
516%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5806     median: 6371 (11%)     max: 6602 Points
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1999     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2519 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1195     median: 1221.5 (31%)     max: 1245 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2937     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 571     avg: 1440     median: 1175 (37%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1356     avg: 6236     median: 3047 (13%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 986 (39%)     max: 1018 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2598     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1532 Points (15%)
292%
N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
1399 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2742 Points (3%)
408%
N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (11%)     max: 11264 Points
4001 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (16%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (6%)     max: 4085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3958 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1202 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1049     median: 1024.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
3476 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
258.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N100 +
50984 Points (39%)
11297 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.5     median: 134.3 (37%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.5     median: 170.9 (31%)     max: 187.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 706     avg: 779     median: 786 (29%)     max: 839 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.7 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.9     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.92     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 6.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J3355 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 395% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 131% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 02. 02:45:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11501 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751417131s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:20:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11501 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 11501 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.013s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.008s ... 0.035s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.083s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)