Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Celeron N5100

Intel Celeron 6305

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6305

The Intel Celeron 6305 (or 6305U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads - no Hyper-Threading/SMT). The clock speed is set at 1.8 GHz as the chip does not support Turbo Boost.

Performance

The average 6305 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N4505, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very poor result, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics фвфзеук based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake). In the 6305U Intel calls it just UHD Graphics and it offers 48 EUs.

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm+ process (called 10 nm SuperFin) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the N5100 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 20% slower than the N6000, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. In other words, this is a fairly slow processor that is unlikely to make anybody happy.

Power Consumption

Like most other N-class Intel processors, this Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation or second-generation [no exact data available] 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron 6305Intel Celeron N5100
CodenameTiger Lake-UJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 6305 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1800 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron 6305
17.3 pt (29%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1056     avg: 1072     median: 1071.5 (1%)     max: 1087 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 566     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (24%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
217 Points (24%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
416 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 160.8     avg: 161.1     median: 161.1 (1%)     max: 161.3 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 82.6     avg: 84     median: 84 (23%)     max: 85.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.9 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3465 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6611 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1231 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1210 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 4226     avg: 4263     median: 4262.5 (2%)     max: 4299 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2233     avg: 2238     median: 2237.5 (26%)     max: 2242 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
61.9 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.69     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.71 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2824     avg: 2834     median: 2834 (20%)     max: 2844 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
905 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1723     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (5%)     max: 2148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19614     avg: 19990     median: 19990 (17%)     max: 20366 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1619     avg: 1639     median: 1638.5 (4%)     max: 1658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2368     avg: 2391     median: 2390.5 (4%)     max: 2413 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 632     avg: 638     median: 638 (25%)     max: 644 Points
631 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1154     avg: 1198     median: 1198 (2%)     max: 1242 Points
1788 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 626     avg: 629     median: 628.5 (3%)     max: 631 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1151     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (4%)     max: 1216 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2776     avg: 2825     median: 2824.5 (28%)     max: 2873 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4762     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (5%)     max: 5137 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1678     avg: 1681     median: 1681 (2%)     max: 1684 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
326.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
21416 Points (16%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 99.2     avg: 100.7     median: 100.7 (18%)     max: 102.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 501     avg: 508     median: 507.5 (19%)     max: 514 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.8 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 6305 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 124% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 13:31:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12244 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754566278s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12244 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12244 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.04s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)