Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron B810 vs AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 vs AMD Ryzen 9 270

Intel Celeron B810

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B810 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B810 should be similar fast as a 1.7-2 GHz Arrandale Celeron (e.g. Celeron P4500).

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The CPU was first leaked in support documents of Fujutsu laptops (Lifebook P701, S751, S761, ...).

AMD Ryzen 9 H 270

► remove from comparison AMD R9 H 270

The Ryzen 9 H 270 is a rebadged Ryzen 9 270 (or Ryzen 9 8945HS) for China, making it a fast mobile laptop processor. This is an APU of the Hawk Point family that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was introduced at CES 2025 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 9 270 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Its CPU performance is slated to be identical to the old Ryzen 9 8945HS and R9 7940HS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,800 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The R9 H 270 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for a reasonably good, as of early 2025, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 270

► remove from comparison AMD R9 270

The Ryzen 9 270 is a rebadged Ryzen 9 8945HS, making it a fast mobile laptop processor. This is an APU of the Hawk Point family that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was introduced at CES 2025 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 9 270 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Its CPU performance is slated to be identical to the old Ryzen 9 8945HS and R9 7940HS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,800 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The R9 270 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for a reasonably good, as of early 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron B810AMD Ryzen 9 H 270AMD Ryzen 9 270
CodenameSandy BridgeHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B810 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1600 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L3 Cache2 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 28 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology32 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketPGA988FP8FP8
FeaturesIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.25 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 2077     avg: 2089     median: 2091 (13%)     max: 2099 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 4020     avg: 4060     median: 4079 (3%)     max: 4081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 4995     avg: 5023     median: 5022.5 (3%)     max: 5050 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 2550     avg: 2572     median: 2571.5 (3%)     max: 2593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1409     avg: 1412     median: 1411.5 (17%)     max: 1414 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 44.6     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (9%)     max: 44.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1630     avg: 1635     median: 1633 (3%)     max: 1641 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 14     avg: 21.1     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 24.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 32     avg: 47.6     median: 55.2 (2%)     max: 55.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 762     avg: 1004     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1245 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 B810 +
24210 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 B810 +
11500 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B810 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B810 +
min: 3750     avg: 3779     median: 3778.5 (3%)     max: 3807 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2407 Points (60%)
105%
1 R9 270 +
2524 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
12330 Points (48%)
102%
1 R9 270 +
12516 Points (49%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B810 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 270 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 24. 19:28:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2328 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19851 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19154 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756056503s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2328 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 2328 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19851 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 19851 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19154 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#13 got single benchmarks 19154 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.029s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)