Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-1350 vs Intel Atom N270

AMD A4-1350

► remove from comparison AMD A4-1350

The AMD A4-1350 is a mobile quad-core SoC for compact subnotebooks and tablets introduced in mid-2013. In addition to having 4 CPU cores with a base clock speed of 1.0 GHz (no turbo), the 28nm chip also integrates a Radeon HD 8210 GPU, a single-channel DDR3-1066 memory controller and a Southbridge with various I/O- ports.

Architecture

Both Kabini (for notebooks) and Temash (tablets and compact subnotebooks) are based on AMD's new Jaguar architecture, which replaces the previous Bobcat models (e.g. the E-350). According to AMD, the performance per clock has been increased by about 15 percent. Furthermore, various modern instruction set extensions such as SSE up to version 4.2, AVX and AES are now supported. The finer 28nm production process from TSMC allows lower voltages and/or higher clock rates compared to Bobcat, as well as support for 4 CPU cores.

Performance

Due to the low clock speed of 1.0 GHz, the performance is modest in applications with poor parellization support. In this case, the A4-1350 will hardly surpass the old C-60. However, if all 4 cores are utilized effectively, performance becomes similar to the Sandy Bridge based Pentium 967. For basic office and multimedia tasks, the A4-1350 has sufficient power; however, it will quickly reach its limits in more demanding software.

Graphics

The SoC integrates a Radeon HD 8210 GPU with 128 shaders based on the GCN architecture. Clocked at 300 MHz, the HD 8210 matches a Radeon HD 6430M or Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Recent games as of 2013 are therefore hardly playable. However, older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 8 watts. Thus, the A4-1350 is suitable for slim subnotebooks or larger tablets.

Intel Atom N270

► remove from comparison Intel N270

The Intel Atom N270 is a typical netbook single core CPU which is clocked at 1.6 GHz. The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the N270 is only compareable to a 1.2 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Due to the modern 45nm process (in 2009) and the small size, the power consumption is very low (2.5 Watt TDP). Therfore, the CPU does not need a good cooling system and can be used in very small designs (like Netbooks). 

Package: 437-Ball-µFCBGA, 22 mm × 22 mm

ModelAMD A4-1350Intel Atom N270
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Atom
CodenameTemashDiamondVille
Series: Atom DiamondVille
AMD A6-1450 compare1 - 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-1350 « 1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-1250 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-1200 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom 330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N280 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N270 « 1.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1000 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB56 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 2
TDP8 Watt2.5 Watt
28 nm45 nm, 0.9-1.1625 V
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3-1066MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Hyper-Threading
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
FSB533
Transistors47 Million
Die Size26 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketPBGA437
$44 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N270 +
min: 483     avg: 538     median: 541 (3%)     max: 577 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N270 +
min: 482     avg: 818     median: 830 (1%)     max: 888 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N270 +
min: 3673     avg: 4705     median: 4742 (56%)     max: 5662 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N270 +
min: 116     avg: 143.3     median: 126 (25%)     max: 177.8 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N270 +
min: 461     avg: 478.8     median: 483 (1%)     max: 492 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N270 +
min: 92     avg: 93.4     median: 93 (20%)     max: 95.6 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N270 +
min: 202     avg: 210.7     median: 211.5 (9%)     max: 216 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N270 +
min: 4249     avg: 5121     median: 4482 (20%)     max: 7034 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N270 +
min: 3850     avg: 3977     median: 4000 (2%)     max: 4028 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N270 +
min: 3280     avg: 3330     median: 3338 (3%)     max: 3371 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N270 +
2.3 Points (29%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N270 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 07:20:50

#0 checking url part for id 4594 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 413 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4594 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 4594 +0s ... 0.033s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 413 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 413 +0.116s ... 0.151s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.151s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.193s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.22s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)