Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron 927UE

Intel Celeron 847

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.

The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 927UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 927UE is an ultra low voltage single core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 927UE should be similar fast as a 2.13 GHz Celeron M 560.

ModelIntel Celeron 847Intel Celeron 927UE
CodenameSandy BridgeIvy Bridge
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 847 « 1.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Clock1100 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB
L3 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 847 +
min: 0.57     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.72 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 847 +
min: 0.39     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.42 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 1094     avg: 1270     median: 1269.5 (8%)     max: 1445 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 2026     avg: 2408     median: 2407.5 (2%)     max: 2789 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 2865     avg: 3159     median: 3159 (2%)     max: 3453 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 1564     avg: 1679     median: 1678.5 (2%)     max: 1793 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 847 +
2716 s (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 847 +
80.4 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 847 +
824 Points (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 847 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 847 +
min: 826     avg: 993     median: 992.5 (2%)     max: 1159 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 847 +
35.5 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 847 +
78.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 847 +
1780 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 847 +
15000 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 847 +
7310 MFLOPS (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 847 +
3149 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 847 +
2541 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 847 +
1742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 847 +
1663 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 847 +
2014 Points (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 847 +
552 ms (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 847 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 17. 06:54:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2730 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3594 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765950890s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3594 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 3594 +0s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.024s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.026s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)