Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron 1000M vs Intel Celeron 867

Intel Celeron 847

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.

The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1000M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1000M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1000M is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 867

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 867 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 867 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Pentium 867 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.4 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 867 is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 847Intel Celeron 1000MIntel Celeron 867
CodenameSandy BridgeIvy BridgeSandy Bridge
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 847 « 1.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 867 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Clock1100 MHz1800 MHz1300 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm22 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023rPGA988BBGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size94 mm2
$86 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 847 +
min: 0.57     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.72 Points
226%
1 1000M +
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 847 +
min: 0.39     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.42 Points
183%
1 1000M +
0.7 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 1094     avg: 1270     median: 1269.5 (8%)     max: 1445 Points
195%
1 1000M +
2480 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 2026     avg: 2408     median: 2407.5 (2%)     max: 2789 Points
198%
1 1000M +
4757 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 2865     avg: 3159     median: 3159 (2%)     max: 3453 Points
191%
1 1000M +
6023 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 1564     avg: 1679     median: 1678.5 (2%)     max: 1793 Points
188%
1 1000M +
3151 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 847 +
2716 s (32%)
207%
1 1000M +
1314 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 847 +
80.4 s (16%)
193%
1 1000M +
41.6 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 847 +
824 Points (1%)
156%
1 1000M +
1285 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1000M +
8.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1000M +
47.2 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 847 +
0 GB/s (1%)
226%
1 1000M +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
208%
1 1000M +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
208%
1 1000M +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 847 +
min: 826     avg: 993     median: 992.5 (2%)     max: 1159 Points
194%
1 1000M +
1923 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 847 +
35.5 s (8%)
167%
1 1000M +
21.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 847 +
78.3 s (3%)
166%
1 1000M +
47.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 847 +
1780 s (8%)
165%
1 1000M +
1076 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 847 +
15000 MIPS (7%)
148%
1 1000M +
22230 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 847 +
7310 MFLOPS (6%)
183%
1 1000M +
13410 MFLOPS (10%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1000M +
4757 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1779 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1000M +
13537 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1214 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1648 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 847 +
3149 Points (17%)
157%
1 1000M +
4938 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 847 +
2541 Points (18%)
169%
1 1000M +
4298 Points (30%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 847 +
1742 Points (3%)
173%
1 1000M +
3016 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 847 +
1663 Points (3%)
171%
1 1000M +
2848 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 847 +
2014 Points (5%)
169%
1 1000M +
3405 Points (9%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 847 +
552 ms (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 847 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1000M → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 23. 15:05:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2730 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3717 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3011 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761224735s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:39:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3717 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 3717 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3011 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#13 got single benchmarks 3011 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.044s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.044s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)