ERROR: No CPU found with the ID:820

getCPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German CPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Intel Core i7-820QM vs vs Rockchip RK3188
Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-820QM vs vs Rockchip RK3188

Intel Core i7-820QM

► remove from comparison Intel 820QM

The Intel Core i7 820QM is a high end quad core CPU in 2009. It features 4 cores (quad core CPU) and Hyperthreading. Therefore, 8 threads can be worked on simultaneously.

Because of the Turbo Mode, the CPU is clocked with up to 3.06 GHz and therefore can perform very well in single core applications like older games.

The Core i7 line has an integrated memory controller for DDR3 bars (1066 or 1333). Therefore, the memory performance is very good (compared to older CPUs with external memory controllers). Still, this also leads to the higher TDP of the whole chip.

The Core micro-architecture is still very similar to the one used in the Core 2 CPUs, therefore the performance per MHz (neglecting the integrated memory controller, hyperthreading and Turbo Boost) is similar.

The power consumption of up to 45 Watt (TDP) is quite high for a laptop CPU and because of the Turbo Mode, the power consumption should reach these high values. Therefore, the CPU is only suited for large laptops.

 

Rockchip RK3188

► remove from comparison

The Rockchip RK3188 is a fast ARM SoC primarily designed for tablets. It integrates four ARM Cortex A9 cores with NEON extension and a clock speed of up to 1.8 GHz, a Mali-400 MP4 graphics card (up to 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) and a low-power (LP-)DDR2/DDR3 memory controller. Due to the high clock rates, the performance of the CPU and GPU is superior to other Cortex-A9 quad-cores such as the Nvidia Tegra 3 and Samsung Exynos 4412. These high frequencies are possible due to the 28nm process (TSMC). However, this results in high power consumption and is thus not suited for compact smartphones.

ModelIntel Core i7-820QMRockchip RK3188
SeriesIntel Core i7
CodenameClarksfieldCortex-A9
Series: Cortex-A9
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-840QM1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-820QM « 1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-720QM1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1730 - 3060 MHz1800 MHz
FSB2500
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP45 Watt
Transistors774 Million
Technology45 nm28 nm
Die Size296 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketRPGA989
Architecturex86ARM
$546 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.rock-chips.com
FeaturesMali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 820QM +
min: 2.95     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (4%)     max: 3.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 820QM +
min: 3075     avg: 3457     median: 3271.5 (20%)     max: 4185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 820QM +
min: 8341     avg: 9174     median: 8559 (6%)     max: 11966 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 820QM +
min: 10222     avg: 10498     median: 10317 (7%)     max: 11311 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 820QM +
min: 3709     avg: 3952     median: 3987 (5%)     max: 4101 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 820QM +
min: 424     avg: 1140     median: 1361.5 (16%)     max: 1412 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 820QM +
min: 13.73     avg: 35.2     median: 42 (8%)     max: 43 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 820QM +
min: 3053     avg: 3226     median: 3149 (7%)     max: 3629 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 820QM +
14 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 820QM +
min: 31     avg: 31.7     median: 32 (1%)     max: 32 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 820QM +
min: 765     avg: 787     median: 780 (3%)     max: 817 s
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 820QM +
7734 Points (16%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 820QM +
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (92%)     max: 7.2 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 820QM +
min: 10851     avg: 11570     median: 11251.5 (10%)     max: 12631 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 820QM +
4002 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (6%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (7%)     max: 8812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (8%)     max: 10500 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 476     avg: 498.7     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 130     avg: 131.1     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.1 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 54.9     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.4 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
13698 ms (16%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 849     avg: 1179     median: 1240 (14%)     max: 1388 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 702     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1170 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (3%)     max: 3095 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
5287 points (12%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-820QM → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 26. 19:00:25

#0 checking url part for id 518 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 820 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4137 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.098s ... 0.099s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.099s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 518 +0.003s ... 0.102s

#8 got single benchmarks 518 +0.037s ... 0.138s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 820 +0.002s ... 0.141s

#10 got single benchmarks 820 +0s ... 0.141s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4137 +0.002s ... 0.143s

#12 got single benchmarks 4137 +0.021s ... 0.164s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.164s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.095s ... 0.259s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.259s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)