, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Kryo 260Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
2200 MHz2200 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
11 14
Adreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISPAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 665Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
26 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
26.1 pt (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17865     avg: 20749     median: 20024 (21%)     max: 24652 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2154     avg: 2377     median: 2379 (30%)     max: 2541 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2199     avg: 2369     median: 2370.5 (34%)     max: 2503 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2272 Points (18%)
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2767 Points (25%)
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10733 Points (21%)
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4516 Points (9%)
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6117 Points (16%)
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (25%)     max: 1647
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (19%)     max: 1536
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (8%)     max: 5663
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (17%)     max: 315
min: 313     avg: 322     median: 321.5 (17%)     max: 330
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (8%)     max: 1392
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (8%)     max: 1483
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 309     avg: 311     median: 310.5 (16%)     max: 314
min: 294     avg: 320     median: 329 (17%)     max: 336
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (8%)     max: 1421
min: 1304     avg: 1395     median: 1424 (8%)     max: 1457
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4433.6     avg: 4783     median: 4561.8 (8%)     max: 6719 ms
min: 3796.2     avg: 4103     median: 3951.1 (7%)     max: 4768.9 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (13%)     max: 9671 Points
min: 8463     avg: 10004     median: 10145 (15%)     max: 10945 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (17%)     max: 58 Points
min: 47     avg: 57.9     median: 60 (20%)     max: 63 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
108166 Points (37%)
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
10308 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
35460 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
31064 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
63801 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
140633 Points (25%)
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 26864     avg: 32727     median: 31707 (27%)     max: 45742 Points
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (28%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 27018     avg: 36247     median: 37857 (31%)     max: 44461 Points
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 32489     avg: 33693     median: 33527 (6%)     max: 34855 Points
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 62570     avg: 68985     median: 70133 (25%)     max: 71112 Points
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
172978 Points (23%)
min: 186416     avg: 187414     median: 187414 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 665 +
7121 Points (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 665 +
6505 Points (39%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (29%)     max: 11549 Points
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (11%)     max: 5913 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6189     avg: 6985     median: 6560.5 (43%)     max: 11432 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7437     avg: 8163     median: 8085 (40%)     max: 9051 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 98% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 15:33:01

#0 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.028s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.005s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.028s ... 0.072s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.102s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.105s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)