Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-430M vs Intel Core i3-1315U

Intel Core i5-430M

► remove from comparison Intel 430M

The Intel Core i5-430M is a fast middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.26 to 2.53 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7-620M, the 430M only has 3 MB Level 3 Cache, missing VT-d, Trusted Execution, and AES features and a lower clock speed.

A feature of the new Core i5-430M is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-430M is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. In fact, the 430M even came close to a fast Core 2 Duo T9600 (2.8 GHz) in some benchmarks (e.g. Cinebench 10 Multi Threaded). This means the 430M is a fast middle class - performance CPU and much faster than the top AMD model, the Turion II Ultra M660 (at the time of announcement).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Still, these functions are deactivated on the Core i5-430M leading to some performance drawbacks in modern applications that support AES encoding using the new instructions (e.g. the Communications Suite test in the PCMark Vantage boosts up to 70% using AES in the faster Core i5-520M).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 500-766 MHz (Turbo Boost) and is clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). The Turbo Boost can overclock the Intel HD Graphics up to 733 MHz when the cores are not fully used.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i3-1315U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1315U

The Intel Core i3-1315U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Raptor Lake-U series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 8 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.2 to 4.5 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 10 MB L3-cache. Compared to the faster i5 and i7 models, the i3 does not include vPro features.

Performance

Thanks to the 100 MHz higher Boost clock speed of the P-Cores, the i3-1315U should be slightly faster than the old i3-1215U.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 15 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 55 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured in a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelIntel Core i5-430MIntel Core i3-1315U
CodenameArrandaleRaptor Lake-U
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Raptor Lake-U
Series: Raptor Lake-U Raptor Lake-U
Intel Core i5-580M compare2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M compare2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M compare2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M compare2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M compare2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M compare2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M compare2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M « 2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM compare1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM compare1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM compare1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM compare1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM compare1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1365U compare1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U « 0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U compare1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Clock2260 - 2533 MHz900 - 4500 MHz
FSB2500
L1 Cache128 KB544 KB
L2 Cache512 KB5 MB
L3 Cache3 MB10 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 46 / 8
2 x 4.5 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP35 Watt15 Watt
Transistors177 Million
Technology32 nm10 nm
Die Size144 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1288, PGA988BGA1700
FeaturesTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, SSE4.1, SSE4.2Thread Director
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1250 MHz)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 430M +
min: 1.56     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.09 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 430M +
min: 2573     avg: 2736     median: 2748 (17%)     max: 2953 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 430M +
min: 5073     avg: 6300     median: 6357 (5%)     max: 6591 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 430M +
min: 5917     avg: 7558     median: 7717.5 (5%)     max: 7937 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 430M +
min: 2954     avg: 3350     median: 3372 (4%)     max: 3454 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 430M +
min: 407.4     avg: 727     median: 642 (8%)     max: 1602 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 430M +
min: 12.68     avg: 23.5     median: 20.7 (4%)     max: 54 s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
23413 MIPS (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1458 Seconds (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 430M +
min: 2330     avg: 2568     median: 2584 (5%)     max: 2654 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 430M +
min: 16     avg: 17.5     median: 17.7 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 430M +
min: 38     avg: 41.4     median: 41.3 (2%)     max: 43.85 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 430M +
min: 900     avg: 962     median: 962 (4%)     max: 1034 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 430M +
min: 27890     avg: 29299     median: 28910 (14%)     max: 31740 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 430M +
min: 22500     avg: 23713     median: 23820 (18%)     max: 26530 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 430M +
min: 5506     avg: 6342     median: 6525.5 (13%)     max: 6809 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 430M +
min: 6.3     avg: 6.6     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 430M +
min: 6803     avg: 7160     median: 7189.5 (6%)     max: 7366 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 430M +
2594 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 430M +
27418 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 430M +
2190 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 430M +
3173 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2323 Points (54%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
5403 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1495 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5350 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
452.5 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
243 Points (63%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
303 Points (54%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
12986 Points (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
12986 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1391 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
22.9 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.6 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-430M → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1315U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 17:58:35

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 535 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14920 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765645115s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Dec 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 535 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 535 +0.038s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14920 +0s ... 0.044s

#10 got single benchmarks 14920 +0.002s ... 0.046s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)