Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-4005U vs Intel Core i3-4110M

Intel Core i3-4005U

► remove from comparison Intel 4005U

The Intel Core i3-4005U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor for ultrabooks which has been presented in Q3/2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel, leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 1.7 GHz (no Turbo Boost support). Compared to the Core i3-4010U, the 4005U offers a slightly lower GPU clock, less I/O-ports and lacks support for VT-d.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving the performance per clock by almost 10 percent. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

The performance of the Core i3-4005U is slightly above the old and slightly higher clocked Core i3-3217U. However, when using new instructions such as AVX2 the performance can be significantly better. Thus, the CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most applications.

The integrated HD Graphics 4400 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 950 MHz (with Turbo Boost), making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics 4000 (at similar clocks). However, the HD 4400 is significantly slower than the HD 5000 of other ULV models.

The Core i3-4005U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Core i3-4110M

► remove from comparison Intel 4110M

The Intel Core i3-4110M is a middle-class dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q2 2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.6 GHz and includes no Turbo Boost support.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i3-4110M is about as fast as the former Sandy Bridge model i5-2450M and can handle all typical office and multimedia tasks as well as more demanding software.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1100 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

The i3-4110M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 14-inches or greater.

ModelIntel Core i3-4005UIntel Core i3-4110M
CodenameHaswellHaswell
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i3
Series: Core i3 Haswell
Intel Core i3-4110M2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4000M compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4010U compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4005U « 1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4020Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4110M « 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4000M compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4010U compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4005U1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4020Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock1700 MHz2600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt37 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesHD Graphics 4400 (200 - 950 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIHD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4400 (200 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Transistors960 Million
Die Size130 mm2
SocketrPGA
$225 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4005U +
min: 171     avg: 171.7     median: 172 (1%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4005U +
min: 39     avg: 58.7     median: 68 (19%)     max: 69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4005U +
min: 1.84     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 1.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4005U +
min: 0.75     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 4005U +
min: 2513     avg: 2518     median: 2514 (15%)     max: 2528 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 4005U +
min: 5685     avg: 5707     median: 5706 (4%)     max: 5730 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 4005U +
min: 7392     avg: 7435     median: 7445 (5%)     max: 7469 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 4005U +
min: 3295     avg: 3311     median: 3310 (4%)     max: 3327 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 4005U +
min: 889     avg: 922     median: 921.5 (11%)     max: 954 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 4005U +
min: 27.95     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (6%)     max: 30.44 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 4005U +
1853 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 4005U +
min: 10.88     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (4%)     max: 11 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 4005U +
min: 57.3     avg: 57.7     median: 57.7 (13%)     max: 58 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 4005U +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 4005U +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 4005U +
1 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 4005U +
2211 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 4005U +
min: 21.86     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (5%)     max: 21.89 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 4005U +
min: 48.64     avg: 49.2     median: 49.2 (2%)     max: 49.75 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 4005U +
min: 1085     avg: 1087     median: 1087 (5%)     max: 1089 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 4005U +
6042 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 4005U +
min: 1944     avg: 2327     median: 2507 (6%)     max: 2530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 4005U +
min: 19183     avg: 19503     median: 19209 (16%)     max: 20117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 4005U +
18619 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 4005U +
21641 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 4005U +
min: 1634     avg: 1691     median: 1672 (4%)     max: 1766 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 4005U +
min: 2291     avg: 2362     median: 2362 (4%)     max: 2433 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 4005U +
3441 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 4005U +
1673 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 4005U +
3960 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 4005U +
min: 182.1     avg: 190.6     median: 190.6 (2%)     max: 199 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 4005U +
8010 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-4005U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 06. 05:17:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4570 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5883 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733458637s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:18:37 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4570 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 4570 +0.008s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5883 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 5883 +0s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.028s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)