AMD Ryzen 7 3780U vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

AMD Ryzen 7 3780U

► remove AMD R7 3780U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (Microsoft Surface Edition) is a mobile SoC that was announced in Oct 2019 as part of the new Surface Laptop 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3780U offers the faster Vega 11 instead of the Vega 10 GPU.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 3780U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 2700U. In our benchmark the Ryzen 7 3700U and therefore also the 3780U could not pull ahead much compared to the average Ryzen 7 2700U.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 7 3780UAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
» AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U compare2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U compare2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
2300 - 4000 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 84 / 4
15 15
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000) ( - 1200 MHz)
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 PRO 3300U

Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
290 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
1580 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
788 Points (18%)
481 Points (11%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points (74%)
126 Points (56%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
5.5 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
1.4 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
22657 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6410 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
5408 points (24%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
4646 Points (12%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
6596 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
890 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3380 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
940 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3050 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3780U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 68% n=2

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)