The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 01. 06:24:42
#0 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.003s ... 0.037s
#8 got single benchmarks 422 +0.018s ... 0.055s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0.003s ... 0.058s
#10 got single benchmarks 449 +0.037s ... 0.095s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0.003s ... 0.098s
#12 got single benchmarks 473 +0.011s ... 0.109s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.101s ... 0.21s