Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 740

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 740

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 740

The Qualcomm Adreno 740 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2023 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno GPU offers a 25% improved performance compared to the Adreno 730 predecessor in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. First benchmarks show that the Adreno GPU can even beat the Apple A16 GPU (iPhone 14 Pro series) in synthetic benchmarks. Therefore, the Adreno 740 is the fastest graphics chip for smartphones in 2022.

The iGPU supports hardware accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (for bloom, depth of field and motion blur). Another first, is the support for Vulkan 1.3.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is produced in the modern 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 740
Adreno 700 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 16.11.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 740GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 28 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 12891     avg: 16677     median: 16746 (73%)     max: 18846 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 25211     avg: 33069     median: 34390.5 (76%)     max: 38087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 10839     avg: 14511     median: 14696.5 (62%)     max: 16291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 18010     avg: 24115     median: 24891.5 (62%)     max: 26802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
14235 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
24605 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 9805     avg: 13918     median: 14012 (7%)     max: 14789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 3088     avg: 3641     median: 3700 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
min: 18     avg: 29.3     median: 30 (11%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 24     avg: 60.8     median: 62.5 (11%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 82     avg: 147.5     median: 155.5 (12%)     max: 181 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 67     avg: 120.2     median: 126 (12%)     max: 166 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 108     avg: 199.4     median: 213 (5%)     max: 226 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 115     avg: 277.5     median: 288 (12%)     max: 346 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 740
min: 301     avg: 456.8     median: 480.5 (4%)     max: 502 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 449271     avg: 555498     median: 570026 (57%)     max: 590837 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
min: 469023     avg: 583912     median: 590587 (47%)     max: 611661 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 208.55     avg: 211     median: 210.4 (5%)     max: 214.17 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 6548     avg: 8858     median: 8918 (2%)     max: 9784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 3587     avg: 9009     median: 9361 (2%)     max: 10144 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 3.83     avg: 9.5     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 14.5 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 175% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
99%
Adreno 740:
58.5 60.1 ~ 59 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
101%
Adreno 740:
60.1  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
103%
Adreno 740:
59 59.2 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
116%
Adreno 740:
59 60 60 60 60 61 63 117 119 120 ~ 78 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
164%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 87.5 87.8 89 90 90 ~ 72 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
152%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
188%
Adreno 740:
56.8 59 59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 740:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 740:
116  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 740:
60  fps
high
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 740:
120  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 132%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 129%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 740
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
Genshin Impact59.559.358.25960.160
Armajet6778
PUBG Mobile4439.53272606040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Dead Trigger 2116
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Subway Surfers120
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 740
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


2


1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3


2


5
1
1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 11:09:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11440 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753780141s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:18:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.034s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11440 +0s ... 0.035s

#11 got single benchmarks 11440 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.042s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.042s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.044s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.055s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.055s

#21 Got 117 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.086s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.086s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.086s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.09s

#25 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.09s

#26 return log +0.001s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)