Vivo V29e
Specifications
![Vivo V29e Vivo V29e](typo3temp/_processed_/a/5/csm_vivo_V29e_b8e53c5523.jpg)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.4
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 18 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo V29e
Source: Yugatech
![English](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_2.gif)
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 12/22/2023
Source: Yugatech
![English](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_2.gif)
In this video we are going through our Favorite Features on the vivo V29e 5G, the vivo V29 5G's younger brother, officially available on our local shores today.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2023
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal
![English](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_2.gif)
While there are other options available, the V29e stands out with its commendable design, good AMOLED screen, ample storage with 256GB on the base variant, and fantastic cameras. Additionally, Vivo V29e is still a “cheaper” phone compared to something like the Samsung Galaxy A34 with a charger, back cover, and even screen protector included in the box. Despite all the good things with this Vivo offering, there is room for improvement on the software front with longer updates and lesser bloatware. In conclusion, the Vivo V29e is a balanced midrange phone and offers good value for its price range. That wraps up our review of the Vivo V29e. I hope you found this review helpful! The Vivo V29e gets most things right for the NPR 42,999 price tag! You get an OIS enabled 64MP shooter with vibrant picture outputs, a good quality E4 AMOLED panel, and 44W charing speed. My complaints here would be the single speaker setup and not so wonderful FunTouch OS, if you ask!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2023
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Unbox
![English](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_2.gif)
Those considering the V27e should opt for the V29e, despite its slightly higher price. The upgraded camera setup, including the reintroduced ultra-wide camera, a high-resolution 50-megapixel selfie shooter, and support for Full HD recording at 60FPS, make the V29e a compelling choice. Additionally, the V29e’s 5G connectivity and excellent battery life contribute to its better overall value.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2023
Source: Think Digit
![English](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_2.gif)
So the Vivo V29e, in a nutshell, is overpriced. But only if you look at it from the performance angle. Otherwise, it comes with Vivo’s premium design language with the curved glass and everything, and we get a very good camera setup with great battery and an accurate display. However, the underwhelming performance makes it difficult to recommend the Vivo V29e in a heartbeat since offering a Snapdragon 695 will limit the experience in the longer run, even for those who aren't looking for a powerful performance-centric device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2023
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 64% performance: 57% workmanship: 61%
Source: Mobygyaan
![English](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_2.gif)
The vivo V29e is surprisingly slim (7.57) and lightweight and it looks promising in terms of design. Its curved design and glass back feel highly premium and the color-changing glass back (Artistic Red variant) is another design trait to see. It has a solid camera package in this segment, both the front and the back which takes stunning portraits. There are a host of things on the smartphone which makes it an all-rounder midranger – slim and curved design, impressive display and cameras, and smooth performance in the midrange segment. Overall, the vivo V29e is a recommended buy for those carrying a budget between ₹25,000 to ₹30,000.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/28/2023
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mega Obzor
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_10.gif)
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; great display; decent performance. Negative: No memory card slot; poor video recording.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2023
Source: Cell Phones
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; thin frames; decent display. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/25/2023
Source: Cell Phones
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Attractive price; very good cameras; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2023
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; great selfie camera; slim size; light weight; decent hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2023
Source: Viettelstore
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful hardware; quick charging; big screen; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/09/2023
Source: Viettelstore
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Modern design; big screen; beautiful display; high performance; long battery life; impressive cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/02/2023
Source: Cell Phones
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; nice cameras; decent hardware; impressive autonomy; attractive price.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 11/01/2023
Source: Viettelstore
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Stylish design; nice display; decent autonomy; good performance; impressive cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/30/2023
Source: Viettelstore
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Beautiful design; attractive price; decent hardware; nice dual cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2023
Source: Viettelstore
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Beautiful display; decent hardware; nice performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/24/2023
Source: The Gioididong
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_13.gif)
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; decent processor; impressive selfie camera; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2023
Source: Jagat Review
![](https://www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_14.gif)
Positive: Good price; support 5G; impressive cameras; nice display; decent autonomy; stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2023
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 619: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 750G) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance is a lot better than the old Adreno 612.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 695 5G: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 660 cores (two fast 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 based cores in a cluster and six power saving ARM Cortex-A55 based cores at 1.7 GHz) and a lower mid range Adreno 619 GPU. Supports only Wi-Fi 5 and is manufactured in the 6 nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.78":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.71.5%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.